Macrolinguistic function in temporal lobe epilepsy: a reinterpretation of circumstantiality - D’Aprano, Fiore; Malpas, Charles B.; Roberts, Stefanie E.; Saling, Michael M. (medRxiv, 2022)
Individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) often have an impairment of conversational language manifesting as verbosity and attributable to disruption of cognitive-linguistic networks. The micro- and macrolinguistic underpinnings of this disturbance, and the role of epilepsy and cognitive variables, are yet to be explored. We examined the elicited language output of 16 individuals with TLE and 14 healthy controls under separate monologic discourse tasks: a structured and constrained context, elicited by description of the ‘Cookie Theft’ picture, and an unstructured, unconstrained context, elicited by description of a ‘Typical Day’. We hypothesised that language output in the unstructured context would be characterised by verbosity to a greater extent than language elicited in a structured context. Following transcription and coding, detailed multi-level discourse analysis suggested that a constrained context gives rise to microlinguistic disturbances in individuals with TLE, reducing fluency, with more pauses and fillers. Under an unconstrained context, as anticipated, classical aspects of verbosity emerge in those with TLE, manifesting as longer speaking time, a longer duration of pauses, and a higher proportion of repetitive or redundant statements. Macrolinguistic elements such as coherence and informativeness are widely impacted, particularly disturbing language formulation. Correlations suggest that microlinguistic disturbances are closely linked with the immediate impact of seizures on cognitive-linguistic function, while macrolinguistic disturbances are more broadly impacted by disorder severity and word retrieval deficits. These findings suggest that different psycholinguistic impairments emerge as a function of differing linguistic challenges imposed by constrained and unconstrained conversational contexts. We conclude that these patterns reflect a dynamic linguistic system taking shape under specific contextual conditions.HighlightsA multi-centre multi-level discourse analysis was carried out to examine language in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).Distinct linguistic impairments reflect task demands which differentially affect micro- and macrolinguistic features.In constrained conditions, individuals with TLE exhibit microlinguistic disturbances mainly affecting their fluency and output clarity.In unconstrained conditions, they are verbose and have disturbed coherence where they produce more content that is repetitive or redundant.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was financially supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (Stipend and Fee offset) awarded by the Australian Commonwealth Government and the University of Melbourne to the first author.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee of Melbourne Health gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors