Comparative adverse effects, perceptions and attitudes related to BNT162b2, mRNA1273, or JNJ-78436735 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A population-based longitudinal cohort - Bürzle, Oliver; Menges, Dominik; Maier, Julian D.; Schams, Daniel; Puhan, Milo; Fehr, Jan; Ballouz, Tala; Frei, Anja (medRxiv, 2022)
Importance Long-term control of SARS-CoV-2 requires effective vaccination strategies. This has been challenged by public mistrust and spread of misinformation regarding vaccine safety. Hence, better understanding and communication on the longer-term and comparative experiences of general population individuals following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are required.Objective To evaluate and compare self-reported adverse effects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, participants’ perceptions regarding vaccinations and their compliance with recommended public health measures.Design, Setting and Participants Population-based longitudinal cohort of 575 adults, randomly selected from all individuals presenting to the reference vaccination center of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, for receipt of BNT162b2, mRNA1273, or JNJ-78436735.Exposures BNT162b2, mRNA1273, or JNJ-78436735 vaccines.Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included period prevalence, onset, duration, and severity of self-reported adverse effects over 12 weeks following vaccination with a specific focus on the proportion of participants reporting allergic reactions, menstrual irregularities, or cardiac adverse effects, or requiring hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included risk factors associated with reporting adverse effects, perception of vaccine importance, trust in public health authorities and pharmaceutical companies, and compliance with recommended public health measures.Results 454 (79.0%) participants reported at least one adverse effect during 12 weeks after vaccination. Prevalence was highest among mRNA-1273 recipients (88.7% vs. 77.3% after BNT162b2, 69.1% after JNJ-78436735). Most adverse effects were systemic (72%), occurred within 24 hours (67.9%), and resolved in less than three days (76.3%). 85.2% were reported as mild or moderate. Allergic reactions were reported by 0.4% of participants, hospitalizations by 0.7%, cardiac adverse effects by 1.4%. Menstrual irregularities were reported by 9% of female participants younger than 50 years. Female sex, younger age, higher education, and receipt of mRNA-1273 were associated with reporting adverse effects. Compared to JNJ-78436735 recipients, a higher proportion of mRNA vaccine recipients agreed that vaccination is important (87.5% vs. 28.5%), and trusted public health authorities (80.2% vs. 30.3%) and pharmaceutical companies (71.7% vs. 23.6%).Conclusions and Relevance Our population-based cohort provided real-world data on self-reported adverse effects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and highlights the importance of transparent communication regarding adverse effects and building trust in public health authorities to ensure successful future vaccination campaigns.Main Points Our representative population-based cohort study demonstrated the safety of three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and provides real-world estimates on adverse effect incidence.Transparent communication of expected adverse effects to vaccine-seeking individuals is pivotal to build trust in current or future vaccination campaigns.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funds received within the Corona Immunitas research network, of which this study is part of. The Corona Immunitas research network is coordinated by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) and funded by fundraising of SSPH+ including funds of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and private funders (ethical guidelines for funding stated by SSPH+ were respected), by funds of the cantons of Switzerland (Vaud, Zurich, and Basel), and by institutional funds of the Universities. Additional funding specific for this cohort was received from the Uniscientia Foundation (Switzerland). TB received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 801076, through the SSPH+ Global PhD Fellowship Programme in Public Health Sciences (GlobalP3HS) of the SSPH+. DM received funding by the UZH Postdoc Grant, grant no. FK-22-053.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich (BASEC 2021-00273)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.