Comparative IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection or vaccination - Olds, Kaylan M.; Humphreys, Devon P.; Gavin, Kathleen M.; Wyllie, Anne L.; Bauer, Timothy A. (medRxiv, 2022)
Background Whether vaccination or natural infection provides greater benefit regarding the development of sustained immunity against SARS-CoV-2 remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a direct comparison of IgG durability in vaccinated and unvaccinated adults.Methods This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of antibody durability in 1087 individuals with a median (IQR) age of 42 (35, 52) years who were unvaccinated and previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Arm 1, n=351) or vaccinated against the virus (Arm 2, n=737). Participants self-reported vaccination and infection history and provided self-collected serology samples using mailed collection kits.Results Anti-S1 IgG seroprevalence was 15.6% higher in vaccinated versus unvaccinated, previously-infected individuals across intervals ranging from 1 to 12 months and antibody survival was sustained near 100% through 12 months in the vaccinated group.Conclusions These findings suggest that vaccination as opposed to natural infection alone provides significant advantages in terms of sustained and effective immunity against prior variants of SARS-CoV-2. Future efforts to characterize SARS-CoV-2 immune responses should address hybrid immunity, booster status and formulation, and protection against (sub)variants of Omicron and future lineages, as well as weigh the potential impact of other immune system mechanisms.Competing Interest StatementKaylan Olds, Devon Humphreys, Kathleen Gavin, and Timothy Bauer are full time employees of Everly Health, Inc. Anne Wylie has no conflicts to report.Funding StatementThis study was funded and conducted by Everly Health, Inc.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This protocol was approved by WCG IRB (IRB registration #20210763). All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment in the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.COVID-19Coronavirus Disease 2019DBSdried blood spotIgGImmunoglobulin GIQRInterquartile rangeNAbNeutralizing antibodyUSUnited StatesWHOWorld Health Organization