Preferences and Acceptability for Long-Acting PrEP Agents Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women with Experience Using Daily Oral PrEP in South Africa and Kenya - Wara, Nafisa J.; Mvududu, Rufaro; Marwa, Mary M.; Gómez, Laurén; Mashele, Nyiko; Orrell, Catherine; Moucheraud, Corrina; Kinuthia, John; John-Stewart, Grace; Myer, Landon; Hoffman, Risa; Pintye, Jillian; et al. (medRxiv, 2022)
Introduction Long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options could overcome some barriers to oral PrEP persistence during pregnancy and postpartum. We evaluated long-acting PrEP preferences among oral PrEP-experienced pregnant and postpartum women in South Africa and Kenya, two countries with high coverage of oral PrEP and with pending regulatory approvals for long-acting injectable cabotegravir and the dapivirine vaginal ring (approved in South Africa, under review in Kenya).Methods From September 2021 to February 2022, we surveyed pregnant and postpartum women enrolled in oral PrEP studies in South Africa and Kenya. We evaluated oral PrEP attitudes and preferences for existing and future long-acting PrEP methods.Results We surveyed 190 women in South Africa (67% postpartum; median age 27 years [IQR 22-32]) and 204 women in Kenya (79% postpartum; median age 29 years [IQR 25-33]). 75% of participants reported oral PrEP use within the last 30 days. Overall, 49% of participants reported negative oral PrEP attributes, including side effects (21% South Africa, 30% Kenya) and pill burden (20% South Africa, 25% Kenya). Preferred PrEP attributes included long-acting method, effectiveness, safety while pregnant and breastfeeding, and free medication. Most participants (75%, South Africa and Kenya) preferred a potential long-acting injectable over oral PrEP, most frequently for longer duration of effectiveness in South Africa (87% South Africa, 42% Kenya) versus discretion in Kenya (5% South Africa, 49% Kenya). 87% of participants preferred oral PrEP over a potential long-acting vaginal ring, mostly due to concern about possible discomfort with vaginal insertion (82% South Africa, 48% Kenya). Significant predictors of long-acting PrEP preference included past use of injectable contraceptive (aOR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.57), disliking at least one oral PrEP attribute (aOR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.80), and preferring infrequent PrEP use (aOR 1.58, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.65).Conclusions Oral PrEP-experienced pregnant and postpartum women expressed a theoretical preference for long-acting injectable PrEP over other modalities, demonstrating potential acceptability among a key population who must be at the forefront of injectable PrEP rollout. Reasons for PrEP preferences differed by country, emphasizing the importance of increasing context-specific options and choice of PrEP modalities for pregnant and postpartum women.Competing Interest StatementThe PrEP-PP study received the study drug (Truvada) from Gilead Sciences (Foster City, CA, USA).Funding StatementThis work was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health: R01MH116771 (DJD, LM), The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: 1R01HD106821 (DJD) R01HD100201 (JP), the Fogarty International Center: K01TW011187 (DJD), the National Institute of Nursing Research: R01NR019220 (JP and JK) and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: R01AI125498 (GJS). The PrEP-PP study received the study drug (Truvada) from Gilead Sciences (Foster City, CA, USA). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The PrEP-PP study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences (#297/2018) and by the University of California, Los Angeles Institutional Review Board (IRB#18-001622). The PrIMA-X study was approved by the Kenyatta National Hospital-University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee (P73/02/2017) and by the University of Washington Human Subjects Division (STUDY00000438).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, Nafisa Wara (nwaraatmednet.ucla.edu).