RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Low back pain service utilization and costs: association with number of visits of chiropractic manipulation, active care, manual therapy or acupuncture. A retrospective cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.10.28.22281664
DO 10.1101/2022.10.28.22281664
A1 Elton, David
A1 Zhang, Meng
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/28/2022.10.28.22281664.abstract
AB Background For individuals with low back pain (LBP), in the absence of serious pathology clinical practice guidelines (CPG) recommend a stepped approach to management with first-line emphasis on natural history, self-care, and non-pharmaceutical therapies. For individuals with non-surgical LBP initially contacting a chiropractor (DC), physical therapist (PT), or licensed acupuncturist (LAc), the purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the dose response association between the number of visits of chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT), active care (AC), manual therapy (MT), or acupuncture, exposure to second- and third-line services, and total episode cost.Methods A national sample of individuals with a single episode of non-surgical LBP occurring in 2017-2019 was analyzed using episode of care as the unit of analysis. The primary independent variables were initial contact with either a DC, PT, or LAc, and the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture. Dependent measures included rate and timing of use of 13 types of health care services and total episode cost.Results 132,199 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older initially contacted 21,336 different DCs, 2,734 PTs and 1,339 LAcs for a single episode of non-surgical LBP. These individuals were associated with $62,185,930 in expenditures. The most common number of visits was 1 to 3 - CMT (48.2% of episodes), AC (29.7%), MT (32.1%), and acupuncture (27.0%). For each service, 1 to 3 visits was associated with the lowest rate of exposure to second- and third-line services although rate differences between visit dose categories were generally not significant or clinically. Episode total cost and duration increased significantly with increasing number of visits. CMT was associated with lowest median total episode cost at each level of visit utilization.Conclusions For non-surgical LBP episodes initially contacting a DC, PT or LAc, 1 to 3 visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture was the most common level of utilization, associated with the lowest exposure to second- and third-line services and lowest total episode cost. Among, CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture, CMT was associated with the lowest total episode cost at each level of utilization. A higher number of visits of CMT, AC, MT or acupuncture was associated with significantly higher total cost, without meaningful impact on exposure to second- or third-line services. Unmeasured clinical benefits may be associated with higher visit counts and warrants further study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:A review was performed to assess compliance with de-identification requirements. As it was determined the data was de-identified or a Limited Data Set in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and customer requirements, the UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research Affairs determined that this study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptLBPLow back painUSUnited StatesCPGClinical practice guidelineDCDoctor of ChiropracticPTPhysical TherapistHCPHealth care providerADIArea Deprivation IndexWTPWillingness to paySTROBEStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyETG®Episode Treatment Group®ERG®Episode Risk Group®ACPAmerican College of PhysiciansRRRisk ratioOROdds ratioSDStandard deviationCMTChiropractic manipulative treatmentACActive careMTManual therapy