Cognitive Interview Validation of a Novel Household Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Instrument - Amberson, Taryn; Ndayishimiye, Olive; Cloud, Quanah Yellow; Castner, Jessica (medRxiv, 2022)
Background Weather and climate disasters are responsible for over 13,000 USA deaths, worsened morbidity, and 1.7 trillion additional costs over the last 40 years with profound racial disparities. This project empirically generated items for a novel survey instrument of household hazard vulnerability with initial construct validation while addressing racial data bias.Methods Cognitive interviewing methodology was completed with transdisciplinary disaster expert panelists (n=20) from diverse USA regions on 60 unique hazard, disaster, or event items. Interview video recordings were qualitatively analyzed using thematic and pattern coding.Results A cognitive process mapped to themes of disaster characteristics, resources, individual life facet, and felt effect was revealed. 379 unique instances of linked terms as synonyms, co-occurring, compounding, or cascading events were identified. Potential for racial data bias was elucidated. Analysis of radiation exposure, trauma, criminal acts of intent items revealed participants may not interpret survey items with these terms as intended.Discussion The findings indicate the potential for racial data bias relative to water dam failure, evacuation, external flood, suspicious package/substance, and transportation failure. Hazard terms that were not interpreted as intended require further revision in the validation process of individual or household disaster vulnerability assessments.Conclusion Several commonalities in the cognitive process and mapping of disaster terms may be utilized in disaster and climate change research aimed at the individual and household unit of analysis.Highlights⍰ Older adults and those with Black/African American racial identities are particularly susceptible to post-disaster health sequelae.⍰ Prior to this study, no household-level Hazard Vulnerability Analysis existed. Quantifying risk for at-risk individuals/groups is a necessary initial step for working to eliminate disparities in large-scale disaster health outcomes.⍰ Our findings indicate the potential for racial data bias relative to water dam failure, evacuation, external flood, suspicious package/substance, and transportation failure. Overall, several hazard, disaster, and event terms were not interpreted by survey-takers as intended, which may require elimination, replacement, or further revision in the validation process of individual or household assessments.Competing Interest StatementThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. TA, ON, VC The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jessica Castner is President and Principal of Castner Incorporated, 21-22 National Academy Distinguished Nurse Scholar in Residence (supported by the American Academy of Nursing, American Nurses Association, and American Nursing Foundation), and as Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Emergency Nursing in 2022. Jessica Castner has received recent travel support from the National Academy of Medicine and the Emergency Nurses Association. Dr. Castner also receives funding support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences under award #R25ES033452 (PI: Castner). Funding StatementFunding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health And Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R43MD017188 (PI: Castner). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of record for Castner Incorporated determined that this research project is exempt from IRB oversight using the Department of Health and Human Services regulations found at 45 CFR 46.104(d)(2). This IRB also completed the necessary additional limited review considerations as set forth under the Revised Common Rule, 45 CFR 46.104(d).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.