RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effects of single plant-based vs. animal-based meals on satiety and mood in real-world smartphone-embedded studies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.10.24.21265240
DO 10.1101/2021.10.24.21265240
A1 Medawar, Evelyn
A1 Zedler, Marie
A1 de Biasi, Larissa
A1 Villringer, Arno
A1 Witte, A. Veronica
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/12/2021.10.24.21265240.abstract
AB Adopting plant-based diets high in fiber may reduce global warming and obesity prevalence. Physiological and psychological determinants of plant-based food intake remain unclear. As fiber has been linked with improved gut-brain signaling, we hypothesized that a single plant-based (vegetarian and vegan) compared to an animal-based (animal flesh) meal, would induce higher satiety, higher mood and less stress. In three large-scale smartphone-based studies, adults (nall = 16,379) ranked satiety and mood before and after meal intake. Meal intake induced satiety and higher mood. Plant-based meal choice did not explain differences in post-meal hunger. Individuals choosing a plant-based meal reported slightly higher mood before and smaller mood increases after the meal compared to those choosing animal-based meals. Protein content marginally mediated post-meal satiety, while gender and taste ratings had a strong effect on satiety and mood in general. We could not detect profound effects of plant-based vs. animal-based meals on satiety and mood.Competing Interest StatementThe authors declare no competing interests. Authors had the following dietary adherences at the time of study: omnivorous (LdB, AV), vegetarian (AVW), vegan (EM, MZ).Funding StatementFunding was provided by the Max Planck Society and a promotion stipend by the German Federal Environmental Foundation (EM).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig approved the study protocol and all participants provided written informed consent. The study was divided into three sub-studies and pre-registered at https://osf.io/a7yts (28 Nov 2019).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw data, scripts and meal photos are stored at https://osf.io/mqc5d/ and can be used for further nutrient analysis or other purposes upon request to the corresponding author. https://osf.io/mqc5d/