PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Roscoe, Sarah
AU  - Skinner, Ellie
AU  - Kibirige, Elaine Kabucho
AU  - Childs, Charmaine
AU  - Weekes, C. Elizabeth
AU  - Wootton, Stephen
AU  - Allen, Scott
AU  - McDermott, Christopher
AU  - Stavroulakis, Theocharis
TI  - A critical view of the use of predictive energy equations for the identification of hypermetabolism in motor neuron disease
AID  - 10.1101/2022.12.19.22283673
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.12.19.22283673
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/20/2022.12.19.22283673.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/20/2022.12.19.22283673.full
AB  - Background and Aims People living with motor neuron disease (MND) frequently struggle to consume an optimal caloric intake. Often compounded by hypermetabolism, this can lead to dysregulated energy homeostasis, prompting the onset of malnutrition and associated weight loss. This is associated with a poorer prognosis and reduced survival. It is therefore important to establish appropriate nutritional goals to ensure adequate energy intake. This is best done by measuring resting energy expenditure (mREE) using indirect calorimetry. However, indirect calorimetry is not widely available in clinical practice, thus dietitians caring for people living with MND frequently use energy equations to predict resting energy expenditure (pREE) and estimate caloric requirements. Energy prediction equations have previously been shown to underestimate resting energy expenditure in over two-thirds of people living with MND.Hypermetabolism has previously been identified using the metabolic index. The metabolic index is a ratio of mREE to pREE, whereby an increase of mREE by ≥ 110% indicates hypermetabolism. We propose that the use of energy prediction equations to inform a metabolic index to indicate hypermetabolism in people living with MND is inappropriate and results in a biased identification of hypermetabolism in lighter individuals.Methods mREE was derived using VO2 and VCO2 measurements from a GEMNutrition indirect calorimeter. pREE was estimated by Harris-Benedict (HB) (1919), Henry (2005) and kcal/kg/day predictive energy equations. The REE variation, described as the percentage difference between mREE and pREE, determined the accuracy of pREE ([pREE-mREE]/mREE) x 100), with accuracy defined as ≤ ± 10%. A metabolic index threshold of ≥ 110% was used to classify hypermetabolism. All resting energy expenditure data are presented as kcal/24hr.Results Sixteen people living with MND were included in the analysis. The mean mREE was 1642 kcal/24hr ranging between 1110 and 2015 kcal/24hr. When REE variation was analysed for the entire cohort, the HB, Henry and kcal/kg/day equations all overestimated REE, but remained within the accuracy threshold (mean values were 2.81% for HB, 4.51% for Henry and 8.00% for kcal/kg/day). Conversely, inter-individual REE variation within the cohort revealed HB and Henry equations both inaccurately reflected mREE for 68.7% of participants, with kcal/kg/day inaccurately reflecting 41.7% of participants. Whilst the overall cohort was not classified as hypermetabolic (mean values were 101.04% for HB, 98.62% for Henry and 95.64% for kcal/kg/day), the metabolic index ranges within the cohort were 70.75% - 141.58% for HB, 72.82% - 127.69% for Henry and 66.09% – 131.58% for kcal/kg/day, indicating both over- and under-estimation of REE by these equations. We have shown that pREE correlates with body weight (kg), whereby the lighter the individual, the greater the underprediction of REE. When applied to the metabolic index, this underprediction biases towards the classification of hypermetabolism in lighter individuals.Conclusion Whilst predicting resting energy expenditure using the HB, Henry or kcal/kg/day equations accurately reflects derived mREE at group level, these equations are not suitable for informing resting energy expenditure and classification of hypermetabolism when applied to individuals in clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is funded by the Department of Neuroscience at the University of Sheffield, the Darby Rimmer MND Foundation and the NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre; the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. SPA is funded by an AMA Springboard Award (SBF005_1064).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of The London-Fulham Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work. Reference: 21/PR/0092I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptALSAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAMAArm Muscle AreaBIABioelectrical Impedance AnalysisBMIBody Mass IndexCIConfidence IntervalDEXADual Energy X-Ray AbsorptiometryFeFraction of expiredFiFraction of inspiredHBHarris-BenedictICIndirect CalorimetrymREEMeasured Resting Energy ExpenditureMIMetabolic IndexMNDMotor Neuron DiseaseMUACMid Upper Arm CircumferencepREEPredicted Resting Energy ExpenditureREEResting Energy ExpenditureSDStandard DeviationTSFTriceps Skin FoldVO2Volume of Oxygen inspiredVCO2Volume of Carbon Dioxide expired%ΔREEPercentage Difference in REE24hrTwenty-four hour