An Eye on CAUTI Prevention: Bridging the Gap in the Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections - Yeruva, Karthik; West, Nat; Powell, Warseal (medRxiv, 2023)
Problem The United States Healthcare Systems is burdened heavily by healthcare-associated infections (HAI), as they pose significant risks for increased mortality and morbidity. The most common type of HAI is urinary tract infection (UTI), and these infections are preventable (Strassle et al., 2019). According to the CDC (2021), 12-16% of hospitalized adults will at some point require catheterization; and each day an indwelling catheter remains in place increases the patient’s risks of adverse outcomes by 3-7%. CAUTIs have been linked to increased mortality and morbidity rates across the world. The Centers for Disease Control report urinary tract infections (UTI) lead to more than 13,000 deaths each year (Centers for Disease Control [cdc], 2021).Objective This quality improvement (QI) project will focus on the prevention of hospital-acquired UTIs, specifically those infections related to indwelling devices such as foley catheters. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current evidence-based literature related to CAUTI prevention, trial an intervention that parallels the literature in a local hospital and evaluate those results.Design The researcher focused on the problem of CAUTI, analyzed current evidence-based practices related to prevention, developed a plan to execute a high-value improvement tool, and evaluated its effectiveness.Setting QI project took place in a local community hospital. The focus area was the medical-surgical ICU.Participants The participants were nursing staff and nursing managers on the medical surgical units, specifically those in positions with unique or direct involvement with insertion, removal, or monitoring of foley catheters. The subjects in this quality improvement project included adult patients hospitalized in the medical surgical intensive care unit (ICU).Interventions A CAUTI GPS screening tool was used to identify current prevention practices and/or any roadblocks to the prevention of CAUTI within the facility. Then, TAP (targeted assessment for prevention) strategy was implemented, which prompted expedited removal of indwelling catheters and/or the use of external drainage devices where indicated.Results There was a marked increase in attention to and prompt removal of indwelling foleys throughout the critical care unit. The facility had no hospital-acquired CAUTI during the project period.Conclusions There must be an impetus to inspire compliance. If healthcare workers adhere to prevention guidelines, CAUTIs are preventable. When leadership team members within hospital systems are enthusiastic about CAUTI prevention, the organization as a whole has increased motivation (Chenoweth et al., 2014).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Ethics committee/IRB of the University of South Alabama gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.