RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Disclosure and Double Standards: A Mixed Methods Study of Self-Disclosure of Mental Illness or Addiction Among Medical Learners
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.16.23290047
DO 10.1101/2023.05.16.23290047
A1 Kassam, Aliya
A1 Antepim, Benedicta
A1 Sukhera, Javeed
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/23/2023.05.16.23290047.abstract
AB Purpose Despite the proliferation of initiatives to address wellbeing and reduce burnout, mental illness and addiction stigma remains rooted within medical education and healthcare. One mechanism to address this stigma is self-disclosure. Given the paucity of literature on self-disclosure in medical learners, we sought to explore perceptions of self-disclosure in medical education.Method In a mixed method, convergent triangulation design, authors recruited medical learners from across Canada. Quantitative data included the Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare providers (OMS-HC), the Self Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (SSMIS), a wellbeing measure, and questions regarding substance use from Statistics Canada. Qualitative data included semi-structured interviews, which were collected and analyzed using a phenomenological approach. Data were collected simultaneously, analyzed separately, and then triangulated. Discrepancies were discussed until consensus was achieved.Results Overall, N= 125 medical learners (n= 67 medical students, n=58 resident physicians) responded to our survey, and N=13 participated in interviews (n = 10 medical students, n =3 resident physicians). OMS-HC scores showed resident physicians had more negative attitudes towards mental illness and disclosure (47.7 vs. 44.3, P = 0.02). Self-disclosure was modulated by the degree of intersectional vulnerability of the learner’s identity. When looking at self-disclosure, people who identified as men had more negative attitudes than people who identified as women (17.8 vs 16.1, P = 0.01). Racialized learners scored higher on self-stigma. Interview data suggested that disclosure was fraught with tensions, but perceived as having a positive outcome, including the perception that self-disclosure made learners better physicians and educators in the future.Conclusion The individual process of disclosure is complex and appeared to become more challenging over time due to the internalization of negative attitudes about mental illness. Intersectional vulnerability in medical learners warrants further consideration. Fear of disclosure is an important factor shaped by the learning environment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Association of Medical Education of Europe (AMEE) Medical Education Research Grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB) at the University of Calgary (ID:20-1149) and the Office of Human Research Ethics (OHRE) at Western University (ID: 116634).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.