ChatGPT may free time needed by the interventional radiologist for administration / documentation: A study on the RSNA PICC line reporting template - Senge, Jan F.; McMurray, Matthew T.; Haupt, Fabian; Breiding, Philipe S.; Beisbart, Claus; Daneshvar, Keivan; Komarek, Alois; Nöldge, Gerd; Mosler, Frank; Bosbach, Wolfram A. (medRxiv, 2023)
Motive Documentation and administration, unpleasant necessities, take a substantial part of the working time in the subspecialty of interventional radiology. With increasing future demand for clinical radiology predicted, time savings from use of text drafting technologies could be a valuable contribution towards our field.Method Three cases of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line insertion were defined for the present study. The current version of ChatGPT was tasked with drafting reports, following the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) template.Key results Score card evaluation by human radiologists indicates that time savings in documentation / administration can be expected without loss of quality from using ChatGPT. Further, automatically generated texts were not assessed to be clearly identifiable as AI-produced.Conclusions Patients, doctors, and hospital administrators would welcome a reduction of the time that interventional radiologists need for documentation and administration these days. If AI-tools as tested in the present study are brought into clinical application, questions about trust into those systems eg with regard to medical complications will have to be addressed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAcknowledgements and funding: The authors wish to thank for all the useful discussions leading to this manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesOnline supplement: study raw data deposited under doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8140755 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8140755