Associations between respiratory health outcomes and coal mine fire PM2.5 smoke exposure: a cross-sectional study - Johnson, Amanda L; Gao, Caroline X; Dennekamp, Martine; Williamson, Grant J; Brown, David; Carroll, Matthew TC; Monaco, Anthony Del; Ikin, Jillian F; Abramson, Michael J; Guo, Yuming (medRxiv, 2019)
Rational In 2014, local wildfires ignited a fire in the Morwell open cut coal mine, in south-eastern Australia, which burned for six weeks. Limited research was available regarding the respiratory health effects of coal mine fire-related PM2.5 smoke exposure.Objective This study examined associations between self-reported respiratory outcomes in adults and mine fire-related PM2.5 smoke exposure.Participants Eligible participants were adult residents of Morwell, identified using the Victorian electoral roll.Main outcome measures Self-reported data were collected as part of the Hazelwood Health Study Adult Survey.Mine fire-related PM2.5 concentrations were retrospectively modelled by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Oceans & Atmosphere Flagship. Personalised mean 24-h and peak 12-h mine fire-related PM2.5 exposures were estimated for each participant. Data were analysed by multivariate logistic regression.Results There was some evidence of a dose-response relationship between respiratory outcomes and mine fire PM2.5 concentrations. Chronic cough was associated with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval 1.03 to 1.23; p-value 0.007) per 10 μg/m3 increment in mean PM2.5 and 1.07 (1.02 to 1.12; 0.004) per 100 μg/m3 increment in peak PM2.5. Current wheeze was associated with peak PM2.5, OR=1.06 (1.02 to 1.11; 0.004) and chronic phlegm with mean PM2.5 OR=1.10 (1.00 to 1.20; 0.052). Males, participants 18-64 years and those residing in homes constructed from non-brick/concrete materials or homes with tin/metal roofs had higher estimated ORs.Conclusions These findings contribute to the formation of public health policy responses in the event of future major pollution episodes.What is the key question?Was there an association between mine fire-related PM2.5 smoke exposure and self-reported respiratory health outcomes for adult residents of Morwell, approximately 2.5 years after the mine fire?What is the bottom line?There was some evidence of a dose-response relationship between respiratory outcomes and mine fire-related PM2.5 concentrations.Why read on?There is limited research regarding the health effects of coal mine fire-related PM2.5 smoke exposure and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine self-reported respiratory symptoms associated with smoke exposure from a coal mine fire.Competing Interest StatementMA holds investigator initiated grants from Pfizer and Boehringer-Ingelheim for unrelated research. He has also undertaken an unrelated consultancy for Sanofi. Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. The paper presents the views of the authors and does not represent the views of the Department. The Department had no involvement: in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. AJ receives an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. YG is supported by a Career Development Fellowship of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDeidentified data could be made available following an individual approach to the authors, approval by the Project Steering Committee and an institutional ethics committee.