RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of student perception and exam validity, reliability and items difficulty: cross-sectional study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19002535
DO 10.1101/19002535
A1 Rezigalla, Assad Ali
A1 Eleragi, Ali Mohammed Elhassan
A1 Elkhalifa, Masoud Ishag
A1 Mohammed, Ammar M A
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/08/09/19002535.abstract
AB Introduction Student perception of an exam is a reflection of their feelings towards the exam items, while item analysis is a statistical analysis of students’ responses to exam items. The study was formulated to compare the student’s perception of the results of item analysis.Material and methods Type of the study is cross-sectional. The study was conducted in the college of medicine, in the duration from January to April 2019. The study uses a structured questionnaire and standardized item analysis of students’ exam. Participants are students registered for semester two level year (2018-2019). Exclusion criteria included all students who refused to participate in the study or do not fill the questionnaire.Result The response rate of the questionnaire was 88.9% (40/45). Students considered the exam as easy (70.4%). The average difficulty index of the exam is acceptable. KR-20 of the exam was 0.906. A significant correlation was reported between student perceptions towards exam difficulty and standard exam difficulty.Discussion Student perceptions support the evidances of exam vlaitdity. Students can estimate exam difficulty.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo fundAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available upon request to the corresponding author.