Nothing About Us Without Us: A Scoping Review and Priority-Setting Partnership in Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise - Klaprat, Nika M.D.; Askin, Nicole; MacIntosh, Andrea; Brunton, Nicole; Hay, Jacqueline L.; Yardley, Jane E.; Marks, Seth D.; Sibley, Kathryn M.; Duhamel, Todd A.; McGavock, Jonathan M. (medRxiv, 2019)
Objectives Examine the characteristics of patient engagement (PE) practices in exercise-based randomized trials in type 1 diabetes (T1D), and facilitate T1D stakeholders in determining the top ten list of priorities for exercise research.Design Two methodological approaches were employed: a scoping review and a modified James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership.Methods Published (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Central databases) and grey literature (www.clinicaltrials.gov) were searched to identify randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions lasting minimum four weeks and available in English. We extracted information on PE and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) to identify if patient perspectives had been implemented. Based on results, we set out to determine exercise research priorities as a first step towards a patient-engaged research agenda. An online survey was distributed across Canada to collect research questions from patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. We qualitatively analyzed submitted questions and compiled a long-list that a twelve-person stakeholder steering committee used to identify the top ten priority research questions.Results Of 9,962 identified sources, 19 published trials and 4 trial registrations fulfilled inclusion criteria. No evidence of PE existed in any included study. Most commonly measured PROMs were frequency of hypoglycemia (n=7) and quality of life (n=4). The priority-setting survey yielded 194 submitted research questions. Steering committee rankings identified 10 priorities focused on lifestyle factors and exercise modifications to maintain short-term glycemic control.Conclusion Recent exercise-based randomized trials in T1D have not included PE and PROMs. Patient priorities for exercise research have yet to be addressed with adequately designed clinical trials.Competing Interest StatementDr. Yardley reports personal fees and non-financial support from Dexcom Canada, non-financial support from Abbott Nutrition Canada, non-financial support from LifeScan Canada, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hay reports grants from Canadian Institute of Health Research Vanier Scholarship, during the conduct of the study.Funding StatementThis study was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SCA-145101) and an Applied Public Health Chair in Resilience and Obesity in Youth held by Dr. McGavock. JLH was supported by a CIHR Vanier Scholarship. KMS holds a Canada Research Chair in Integrated Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation Sciences. NK was supported by a University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship award. The authors do not declare any competing interests in the conduct of these studies.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe de-identified datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.