Exploring the Pitfalls of Large Language Models: Inconsistency and Inaccuracy in Answering Pathology Board Examination-Style Questions - Koga, Shunsuke (medRxiv, 2023)
In the rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and Google Bard are making significant progress, with applications extending across various fields, including medicine. This study explores their potential utility and pitfalls by assessing the performance of these LLMs in answering 150 multiple-choice questions, encompassing 15 subspecialties in pathology, sourced from the PathologyOutlines.com Question Bank, a resource for pathology examination preparation. Overall, ChatGPT outperformed Google Bard, scoring 122 out of 150, while Google Bard achieved a score of 70. Additionally, we explored the consistency of these LLMs by applying a test-retest approach over a two-week interval. ChatGPT showed a consistency rate of 85%, while Google Bard exhibited a consistency rate of 61%. In-depth analysis of incorrect responses identified potential factual inaccuracies and interpretive errors. While LLMs have potential to enhance medical education and assist clinical decision-making, their current limitations underscore the need for continued development and the critical role of human expertise in the application of such models.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorAIArtificial IntelligenceLLMsLarge Language Models