RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 ReMIND: The Brain Resection Multimodal Imaging Database
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.09.14.23295596
DO 10.1101/2023.09.14.23295596
A1 Juvekar, Parikshit
A1 Dorent, Reuben
A1 Kögl, Fryderyk
A1 Torio, Erickson
A1 Barr, Colton
A1 Rigolo, Laura
A1 Galvin, Colin
A1 Jowkar, Nick
A1 Kazi, Anees
A1 Haouchine, Nazim
A1 Cheema, Harneet
A1 Navab, Nassir
A1 Pieper, Steve
A1 Wells, William M.
A1 Bi, Wenya Linda
A1 Golby, Alexandra
A1 Frisken, Sarah
A1 Kapur, Tina
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/15/2023.09.14.23295596.abstract
AB The standard of care for brain tumors is maximal safe surgical resection as the first step. Neuronavigation augments the surgeon’s ability to achieve this but loses validity due to brain shift as surgery progresses. Moreover, many gliomas are difficult to distinguish from adjacent healthy brain tissue. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) is a useful surgical adjunct that can be used to visualize the residual tumor and brain shift. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) serves a similar purpose, while also being faster and easier to incorporate into the workflow. However, it provides lower contrast between tumor tissue and normal brain tissue as compared to intraoperative MRI. With the success of data-hungry Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in advancing the state of the art in medical image analysis, the benefits of sharing well-curated data can not be overstated. To this end, we provide here the largest publicly-available MRI and intraoperative ultrasound imaging database of surgically treated brain tumors, including gliomas (n=92), metastases (n=11), and others (n=11). This collection contains 369 preoperative MRI series, 320 3D intraoperative ultrasound series, 301 intraoperative MRI series, and 356 segmentations collected from 114 consecutive patients at a single institution. We expect this data to be a resource for computational research in brain shift and image analysis as well as for neurosurgical training in the interpretation of intraoperative ultrasound and iMRI.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementR01EB027134, 5P41EB015902, and P41EB028741Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://doi.org/10.7937/3rag-d070 https://doi.org/10.7937/3rag-d070