PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Tavares, N
AU  - Hunt, KJ
AU  - Jarrett, N
AU  - Wilkinson, T M A
TI  - Timing and nature of palliative care discussions are patient-specific according to clinicians: a qualitative study
AID  - 10.1101/2019.12.28.19013417
DP  - 2019 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2019.12.28.19013417
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/29/2019.12.28.19013417.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/29/2019.12.28.19013417.full
AB  - Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with an unpredictable and complex disease trajectory. Consequently, most patients are not involved in advance care planning and do not receive palliative care until the end of life.Aim To explore clinicians’ experiences, opinions and recommendations for the timing and nature of palliative care discussions in COPD.Design Qualitative interviews with nurses and doctors that provide direct care to COPD patients.Setting/Participants 14 clinicians working across primary and secondary care in the UK were interviewed.Results Participants suggested that those with the appropriate expertize and an established relationship with patients were best placed to initiate discussions about palliative and future care. Early, gradual and informed palliative and future care discussions were considered best practice, however they uncommon occurrence due to service, patient and clinician-related barriers. The unpredictable disease trajectory and fine balance between providing acute care and discussing palliative care options were suggested as key greatest barriers for discussions. However, damaging patient hope was a concern for clinicians and reduced their inclination to discuss palliative care. Clinicians did not seem to think that patients were ready for discussions, therefore they avoided broaching the subject leading early in the disease trajectory.Conclusion Stand-alone conversations about and near the end of life was described as current usual practice by clinicians, however individualised early, regular and gradual discussions with patients about immediate and long-term future plans may make such discussions feel less negative and ordinary for patients and clinicians.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding to discloseAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available