PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kirwan, Peter D AU - Hall, Victoria AU - Foulkes, Sarah AU - Otter, Ashley AU - Munro, Katie AU - Sparkes, Dominic AU - Howells, Anna AU - Platt, Naomi AU - Broad, Jonathan AU - Crossman, David AU - Norman, Chris AU - Corrigan, Diane AU - Jackson, Christopher H AU - Cole, Michelle AU - Brown, Colin S AU - Atti, Ana AU - Islam, Jasmin AU - SIREN Study Group AU - Presanis, Anne M AU - Charlett, Andre AU - De Angelis, Daniela AU - Hopkins, Susan TI - Protection of second booster vaccinations and prior infection against SARS-CoV-2 in the UK SIREN healthcare worker cohort AID - 10.1101/2023.09.29.23296330 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.09.29.23296330 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/06/2023.09.29.23296330.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/06/2023.09.29.23296330.full AB - Background The protection of fourth dose mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is relevant to current global policy decisions regarding ongoing booster roll-out. We estimate the effect of fourth dose vaccination, prior infection, and duration of PCR positivity in a highly-vaccinated and largely prior-COVID-19 infected cohort of UK healthcare workers.Methods Participants underwent fortnightly PCR and regular antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2 and completed symptoms questionnaires. A multi-state model was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection from a fourth dose compared to a waned third dose, with protection from prior infection and duration of PCR positivity jointly estimated.Results 1,298 infections were detected among 9,560 individuals under active follow-up between September 2022 and March 2023. Compared to a waned third dose, fourth dose VE was 13.1% (95%CI 0.9 to 23.8) overall; 24.0% (95%CI 8.5 to 36.8) in the first two months post-vaccination, reducing to 10.3% (95%CI - 11.4 to 27.8) and 1.7% (95%CI -17.0 to 17.4) at 2-4 and 4-6 months, respectively. Relative to an infection >2 years ago and controlling for vaccination, 63.6% (95%CI 46.9 to 75.0) and 29.1% (95%CI 3.8 to 43.1) greater protection against infection was estimated for an infection within the past 0-6, and 6-12 months, respectively. A fourth dose was associated with greater protection against asymptomatic infection than symptomatic infection, whilst prior infection independently provided more protection against symptomatic infection, particularly if the infection had occurred within the previous 6 months. Duration of PCR positivity was significantly lower for asymptomatic compared to symptomatic infection.Conclusions Despite rapid waning of protection, vaccine boosters remain an important tool in responding to the dynamic COVID-19 landscape; boosting population immunity in advance of periods of anticipated pressure, such as surging infection rates or emerging variants of concern.Funding UK Health Security Agency, Medical Research Council, NIHR HPRU Oxford, and others.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the UK Health Security Agency, the UK Department of Health and Social Care, with contributions from the governments of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, the National Institute for Health Research, the UK Medical Research Council (Unit Programme Number MC_UU_00002/11 (PDK, CHJ, AMP, DDA), and Grant Ref MR/W02067X/1), NIHR HPRU Oxford (SH, VH), NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at University of Bristol, in partnership with UKHSA (AMP, DDA, AC), and others.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Berkshire Research Ethics Committee Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Approval Wales granted 22 May 2020. IRAS ID 284460I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe metadata will be available through the Health Data Research UK Co-Connect platform and will be available for secondary analysis once the study has completed reporting.