Consistency of the continuous flow pressure gradient despite aortic arch anomalies co-existing with coarctation - Ghorbannia, Arash; Spearman, Andrew D.; Sawalhi, Shahd; Woods, Ronald K.; Maadooliat, Mehdi; LaDisa, John F. (medRxiv, 2023)
Aims Severity assessment for coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is challenging due to concomitant morphological anomalies (complex CoA) and inaccurate Doppler-based indices. Promising diagnostic performance has been reported for the continuous flow pressure gradient (CFPG), but it has not been studied in complex CoA. Our objective was to characterize the effect of complex CoA and associated hemodynamics on CFPG in a clinical cohort.Methods and Results Retrospective analysis identified discrete juxtaductal (n=25) and complex CoA (n=43; transverse arch and/or isthmus hypoplasia) patients with arm-leg systolic blood pressure gradients (BPG) within 24 hours of echocardiography for comparison to BPG by conventional Doppler indices (simplified Bernoulli equation and modified forms correcting for proximal kinetic energy and/or recovered pressure). Results were interpreted using the current CoA guideline (BPG ≥20 mmHg) to compare diagnostic performance indicators including receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, among others. Echocardiography Z-scored aortic diameters were applied with computational stimulations from a preclinical CoA model to understand aspects of the CFPG driving performance differences.Diagnostic performance was substantially reduced from discrete to complex CoA for conventional Doppler indices calculated from patient data, and by hypoplasia and/or long segment stenosis in simulations. In contrast, diagnostic indicators for the CFPG only modestly dropped for complex vs discrete CoA. Simulations revealed differences in performance due to inclusion of the Doppler velocity index and diastolic pressure half-time in the CFPG calculation.Conclusion CFPG is less affected by aortic arch anomalies co-existing with CoA when compared to conventional Doppler indices.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by NIH grant numbers R01-HL142955 and R15-HL096096.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The current study was conducted following exempt determination by the IRB Board of Childrens Wisconsin.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.AAAscending aortaBPBlood pressureCFPGContinuous flow pressure gradientCoACoarctation of the aortaDBPDiastolic blood pressureDVIDoppler velocity indexMBEModified Bernoulli equationPC-MRIPhase contrast magnetic resonance imageROMReduced order modelSBESimplified Bernoulli equationSBE-RPSBE modified for recovered pressureSBPSystolic blood pressure