The provision of information on time-lapse imaging: A systematic analysis of UK fertility clinics websites - Perrotta, Manuela; Zampino, Letizia; Geampana, Alina; Bhide, Priya (medRxiv, 2023)
Research Question This study aims to systematically analyse the provision of information on Time-lapse Imaging (TLI) by UK fertility clinic websites.Design We conducted an analysis of 106 clinic websites that offer fertility treatment to self-funded patients. The analysis aimed to examine whether these clinics offer TLI, the associated cost for patients, and the clarity and quality of the provided information.Results Out of the 106 websites analysed, 71 (67%) claimed to offer TLI, with 17 being NHS clinics and 54 being private clinics. Among these websites, 25 (35.2%) mentioned charging patients between £300 and £850, 25 (35.8%) claimed not to charge patients, and 21 (29.6%) did not provide any cost information for TLI. Although TLI is generally considered safe for patients and embryos, only 21 (29.6%) websites provided information on the associated risks. Furthermore, 64 (90.1%) websites made claims or implied that TLI leads to improved clinical outcomes by enhancing embryo selection. Notably, 34 (47.9%) websites did not mention or provide any links to the HFEA traffic light system. Additionally, 30 (42.2%) websites made claims regarding the effectiveness of TLI that contradicted the assessment of the HFEA, referring to early, mostly unspecified, studies.Conclusions It is crucial to provide patients with clear and accurate information to enable them to make fully informed decisions about TLI, particularly when they are responsible for the associated costs. The findings of this study raise concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information available on fertility clinic websites, which are typically the primary source of information for patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors that the School of Business and Management at Queen Mary University of London for their support in data collection through a small grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors