PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mayo, Nancy
AU  - Hum, Stanley
AU  - Matout, Mohamad
AU  - Fellows, Lesley K
AU  - Brouillette, Marie-Josée
TI  - Portrait of Mental Health Identified by People with the Post-Covid Syndrome
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.15.23298598
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.15.23298598
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/16/2023.11.15.23298598.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/16/2023.11.15.23298598.full
AB  - Aims The Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) represents an epidemic within the COVID-19 pandemic, with potentially serious consequences for affected individuals, the healthcare system, and society at large. Facing a new and poorly understood health condition, this study aimed to produce a patient-centered understanding of mental health symptom patterns, functional impact, and intervention priorities.Methods A cross-sectional analysis of the first 414 participants in a longitudinal study recruited over a 5- month from September 2022 to January 2023 was carried out involving people from Quebec who self-identified as having symptoms of PCS. People were asked to name areas of their mental health affected by PCS using the structure of the Patient Generated Index (PGI), an individualized measure suited to eliciting the most frequent and most bothersome symptoms. The PGI was supplemented with a set of patient-reported outcome measures across the rubrics of the Wilson- Cleary model. The text threads from the PGI were grouped into topics using BERTopic analysis.Results Twenty topics were identified from 818 text threads referring to PCS mental health symptoms nominated using the PGI format. 35% of threads were identified as relating to anxiety, discussed in terms of five topics: generalized/social anxiety, fear/worry, post-traumatic stress, panic, and nervous. 29% of threads were identified as relating to low mood, represented by five topics: depression, discouragement, emotional distress, sadness, and loneliness. A cognitive domain (22% of threads) was covered by four topics referring to concentration, memory, brain fog, and mental fatigue. Topics related to frustration, anger, irritability. and mood swings (7%) were considered as one domain and there were separate topics related to motivation, insomnia, and isolation.Conclusion This novel method of digital transformation of unstructured text data uncovered different ways in which people think about classical mental health domains. This information could be used to evaluate the extent to which existing measures cover the content identified by people with PCS or to justify the development of a new measure of the mental health impact of PCS.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from the Fonds de Recherche de Quebec Sante and by an unrestricted grant from ScotiaBank. Healthy Brains for Heathy Lives (HBHL) provided infrastructure support. None of the funding entities had any role in study design, analysis, writing of the paper, or the decision to publish.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approved by the Research Ethics Board of the McGill University Health Center (2022-8066)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data comprise text and may be made available upon reasonable request to authoer