PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Johnstone, K AU - Turner, S TI - Quantifying the impact of the cluster clinic model on geographic service accessibility AID - 10.1101/2023.12.09.23299757 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.12.09.23299757 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/10/2023.12.09.23299757.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/10/2023.12.09.23299757.full AB - Background Travel distance is a barrier to accessing care, especially in large areas with low population density. The cluster clinic model is designed to provide paediatric scheduled care in the community setting within NHS Grampian. Here, we have quantified the effect on overall travel distance and equality of access.Methods Three models were compared: All clinics delivered at Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, all clinics delivered at cluster clinics, and clinics at both hospital and cluster clinics. Shortest drivable distance from home to clinic in each model was calculated for all children in Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire. Equality of distribution was assessed using a Gini coefficient, with values closer to 0 representing better equality, and 1 representing worse equality.Results In model A, median travel distance was 8.64miles (Q1: 2.96miles, Q3: 25.7miles) with a Gini coefficient of 0.491. For model B, median travel distance was 3.14miles (Q1: 1.46miles, Q3: 9.07miles) with a Gini coefficient of 0.480. In model C, median travel distance was 3.13miles (Q1: 1.35miles, Q3: 9.07miles), with a Gini coefficient of 0.490.Conclusions The cluster clinic model significantly reduces travel distance, whilst simultaneously improving access equality. This methodology should be considered to prospectively evaluate implementation of similar models elsewhere.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://gitlab.com/krj15/cluster-clinics