Priorities and barriers for research related to primary ciliary dyskinesia - Goutaki, Myrofora; Lam, Yin Ting; Rubbo, Bruna; Chalmers, James D; Kouis, Panayiotis; Marsh, Gemma; Papon, Jean-François; Raidt, Johanna; Robinson, Phil; Behan, Laura; Lucas, Jane S (medRxiv, 2024)
Background Despite advances in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) research, many questions remain; diagnosis is complex and no disease specific therapies exist. Using a mixed-methods approach, we aimed to identify priorities for clinical and epidemiological research and explore barriers to research.Methods To obtain rich, relevant, diverse data, we performed in-depth semi-structured interviews with PCD specialists selected using purposive sampling. We transcribed, coded, and analysed interview data using thematic analysis. Based on interview themes we identified, we developed an anonymous survey and circulated it widely through the BEAT-PCD network.Results We interviewed 28 participants from 15 countries across different disciplines and expertise levels. The main themes identified as priorities for PCD research were improving diagnosis, understanding prevalence, and disease course; phenotypic variability; disease monitoring; treatment strategies; clinical trial endpoints; and neglected research areas. In total, 136 participants (49% paediatric pulmonologists) from 36 countries completed the survey. Most commonly reported barriers for research were low awareness about PCD and difficulties securing funding—in more than one-third of cases, participants reported undertaking predominantly unfunded research. Research questions ranked highest included priorities related to further improving diagnosis, treating PCD, managing upper and lower airway problems, and studying clinical variability and disease prognosis.Conclusion We need to overcome barriers of limited funding and low awareness and promote collaborations between centres, disciplines, experts, and patients to address PCD priorities effectively. Our results contribute to the ongoing efforts of guiding the use of existing limited research resources and setting up a roadmap for future research activities.Take home message Our study defined PCD research priorities including improving diagnosis, treatments, managing upper and lower airway disease, and understanding prognosis. Key barriers identified include low disease awareness and limited funding opportunities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe acknowledge the support of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Short-Term Research fellowship Nr 201804-00367. The study was developed as a collaboration between the Universities of Southampton and Bern within the framework of the BEAT-PCD COST Action BM1407 and completed in the BEAT-PCD clinical research collaboration framework, supported by ERS. M Goutaki is supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione fellowship (PZ00P3_185923). Several authors participate in ERN-LUNG (PCD core).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee of the University of Southampton gave ethical approval for this work(ERGO 47010.A1).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.