RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Primary care access and feasibility of Spatial Accessibility Index (SAI) in assessing primary care in rural Sri Lanka
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.10.24301140
DO 10.1101/2024.01.10.24301140
A1 Abeyrathna, Parami
A1 Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika
A1 Weerasinghe, Manjula
A1 Samaranayake, Shyamalee
A1 Pushpakumara, Pahala Hangidi Gedara Janaka
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/12/2024.01.10.24301140.abstract
AB Despite decades of global health efforts and policies, inequitable access to primary care in low and middle-income countries remains an ongoing challenge. This study assessed accessibility to curative sector-primary healthcare services in the Anuradhapura district of Sri Lanka in 2020 and 2021. In this study, we included both private and state-owned primary care facilities (PCF) and their corresponding primary care doctors (PCD), covering both allopathic and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practices. Spatial locations of private sector PCF of the entire district were collected by conducting a comprehensive road-based survey and documenting information from publicly displayed boards. Data on state PCF were collected from provincial health departments (allopathic and Ayurveda). The Spatial Accessibility Index (SAI) of 657 GND (Grama Niladhari Division: the smallest administrative division) was calculated in ARC-GIS using the 2-Steps-Floating-Catchment-Area method in 5 km and 10 km spatial-distances from a GND. The majority of the PCF were allopathic (n=318, 78%) and belonged to the private sector (n=317, 79%) whereas CAM PCD represented one-fifth of the primary care workforce. Average SAI of 4.50X 10-4 and 4.67X 10-4 were reported for both 5 km and 10 km spatial-distance. A statistically significant difference in mean SAI was measured between urban and rural populations. The highest SAI were observed from urban populations and it gradually declined towards the rural remotes. The national primary care coverage target of 1 allopathic PCD per 5000 population was achieved only in 64% of the population in a 5 km spatial-distance and it further depleted to 25% with only of state allopathic PCD. SAI was negatively associated with the poverty headcount indices and distance to main roads and the main town (Anuradhapura). While the private allopathic sector is the main primary care provider in this study setting, a significant proportion of the population reported limited primary care access dueto their geographic and economic status. Health policymakers need to address primary care workforce shortages in rural for the planning of human and physical resources. SAI can be recommended as a feasible method for healthcare planning and assessing service coverage in low-facility settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics approval study was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka (ERC/2020/66).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.