RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exploring gendered patterns of interaction within an inter-professional health care network
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.07.20057364
DO 10.1101/2020.04.07.20057364
A1 Aguirre, Nelson
A1 Carswell, Peter
A1 Kenealy, Tim
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/10/2020.04.07.20057364.abstract
AB Background Numerous studies have shown gender-based similarity affects interactions in organizational contexts. However, studies in the health care arena have shown contradictory findings.Objective To explore gender homophily in an inter-professional network comprising doctors and nurses across the primary and secondary care interface in diabetes care.Methods A Social Network Analysis was conducted with primary and secondary care clinicians responsible for diabetes care in Auckland New Zealand. Three different methods were used to test gender affinity in 40 health professionals (GPs, endocrinologist and specialist nurses). First, a metric analysis of homophily ranking corrected for potential differences in gender proportions was conducted. Homophily ranking is scored between −1 (perfect heterophily) and 1 (perfect homophily). We also examined the ego-net composition and measured the density of interactions among men and women in the network.Results Gender homophily was close to 0, indicated that network members were likely to interact with males and females without preferences, a result that was confirmed through ego-net composition.Conclusions This study in diabetes managed care network found little evidence to support the impact of gender homophily on communication exchange. This contrasts with other studies in the health care context. Other influences need to be explored at this context.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this researchAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNo data is available