Incidence of Mortality and Predictors Among Patients with Shock Managed in the Emergency Room of a Large Tertiary Referral Hospital in Ethiopia - Asfaw, Kalsidagn Girma; Adugna, Abel Getachew; Mekonen, Nahom Mesfin; Leulseged, Tigist Workneh; Merahi, Merahi Kefyalew; Kejela, Segni; Moges, Fekadesilassie Henok (medRxiv, 2024)
Background Shock is a common emergency condition which can lead to organ failure and death if not diagnosed and managed timely. Despite its huge global impact, data is scarce in resource-limited settings, such as Ethiopia, which hinders the provision of quality care for improved patient outcomes. Hence, the aim of the study was to determine the incidence of death and predictors among adult patients with shock managed at the Emergency Department of St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College in Ethiopia.Methods A retrospective chart review study was conducted between July to September 2022 among 178 eligible adult patients who were managed at hospital between October 2021 and May 2022. The characteristics of the participants were summarized using frequency and median with interquartile range. The incidence of mortality was estimated using incidence density using person hour (PH) of observation. To identify predictors of mortality, a generalized linear model using poisson regression model with robust standard errors was run at 5% level of significance, where adjusted relative risk (ARR) with its 95% CI was used to interpret significant resultsResult The incidence of death was 6.87 deaths per 1000 PH (95% CI= 5.44 to 8.69). Significant predictors of death were being triaged orange (ARR=0.46, 95% CI=0.24-0.88, p=0.020), having a high shock index (ARR=1.59, 95% CI=1.07-2.36, p=0.021), being diagnosed with septic shock (ARR=3.66, 95% CI=1.20-11.17, p=0.023), taking vasopressors (ARR=3.18, 95% CI=1.09, 9.27, p=0.034), and developing organ failure (ARR=1.79, 95% CI=1.04-3.07, p=0.035).Conclusion The incidence of mortality among shock patients was found to be considerable but relatively lower than previous studies. To optimize patient care and improve outcomes, it is important to remain vigilant in the proper triage and early diagnosis of shock using more sensitive tools for prompt identification of high-risk cases, as well as to provide timely, prioritized and effective interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was carried out after obtaining ethical approval from the institutional review board of St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC-IRB). The St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College institutional review board (SPHMMC-IRB) also waived the need for informed consent since the study used secondary data (Ref. No. PM23/62). The study was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Confidentiality of the patient's information contained within their registration books, cards, and referral papers were assured by using of medical record number and omitting any personal identifiers. Furthermore, access to the collected information was limited to the investigators.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are available upon reasonable request from Kalsidagn Girma Asfaw at Kalsidagn.asfawatgmail.com.