Student and staff experiences of a novel curriculum-based peer support intervention (“study groups”) to support the mental health and wellbeing of postgraduate taught students - McCloud, Tayla; James, Tiffeny; Rowe, Sarah; Huntley, Jonathan; Lewis, Gemma; Callender, Claire; Johnson, Sonia; Billings, Jo (medRxiv, 2024)
Background In recent years there has been increasing concern for the wellbeing of higher education students, and institutions are under pressure to act. Loneliness and social isolation appear common among students, particularly postgraduate taught (PGT) students, and are linked to adverse outcomes such as depression and abandoning studies. We have in place a novel curriculum-based peer support intervention (“study groups”) that may help support the mental health and wellbeing of postgraduate taught students.Aim This study aimed to explore student and staff experiences of the study groups and their perceptions of how they may influence social cohesion, loneliness and wellbeing.Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with students and staff to explore their experiences and views of the study groups intervention. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed by the study authors following the principles of reflexive thematic analysis.Results We completed interviews with 20 students and five staff members. We found that students valued the study groups as a way to make friends, improve feelings of connectedness and cohesion, and receive emotional support. The shared experience of group members was key, although completing joint assignments could be a stressor for some.Conclusions This research suggests that this is a promising intervention to support the mental health and wellbeing of higher education students, and to reduce loneliness and improve social cohesion.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All procedures were approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee - ref:8227/004. All participants gave written informed consent in advance of taking part in interviews.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableDue to the personal and in-depth qualitative accounts given by participants in this study, and in line with our ethical approval, data has not been made publicly available.