RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quantitative susceptibility mapping for detection of kidney stones, hemorrhage differentiation and cyst classification in ADPKD
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.24.24303322
DO 10.1101/2024.02.24.24303322
A1 Schumacher, Karl
A1 Prince, Martin R.
A1 Blumenfeld, Jon D.
A1 Rennert, Hanna
A1 Hu, Zhongxiu
A1 Dev, Hreedi
A1 Wang, Yi
A1 Dimov, Alexey V.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/27/2024.02.24.24303322.abstract
AB Background and purpose The objective is to demonstrate feasibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients and to compare imaging findings with traditional T1/T2w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients (11 male, 22 female) diagnosed with ADPKD were initially selected. QSM images were reconstructed from the multiecho gradient echo data and compared to co-registered T2w, T1w and CT images. Complex cysts were identified and classified into distinct subclasses based on their imaging features. Prevalence of each subclass was estimated.Results QSM visualized two renal calcifications measuring 9 and 10 mm, and three pelvic phleboliths measuring 2 mm but missed 24 calcifications measuring 1mm or less and 1 larger calcification at the edge of the field of view.A total of 121 complex T1 hyperintense/T2 hypointense renal cysts were detected. 52 (43%) cysts appeared hyperintense on QSM consistent with hemorrhage; 60 (49%) cysts were isointense with respect to simple cysts and normal kidney parenchyma, while the remaining 9 (7%) were hypointense. The presentation of the latter two complex cyst subtypes is likely indicative of proteinaceous composition without hemorrhage.Conclusions Our results indicate that QSM of ADPKD kidneys is possible and uniquely suited to detect large renal calculi without ionizing radiation, and able to identify properties of complex cysts unattainable with traditional approaches.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was performed under an Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board's approved retrospective protocol.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors