PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Balestra, Noah
AU  - Sharma, Gaurav
AU  - Riek, Linda M.
AU  - Busza, Ania
TI  - Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.17.20043869
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.17.20043869
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/22/2020.04.17.20043869.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/22/2020.04.17.20043869.full
AB  - Stroke is a major cause of adult-onset disability worldwide, and approximately 40% of stroke survivors have residual impairment in upper-extremity function. Prior studies suggest that increased participation in rehabilitation exercises improves motor function post-stroke,1 however further clarification of optimal exercise dose and timing has been limited by the technical challenge of quantifying exercise activities over multiple days. In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using body-worn sensors to track rehabilitation exercises in the inpatient setting, and investigated which recording parameters and data analysis strategies are sufficient for accurately identifying and counting exercise repetitions. MC10 BioStampRC® sensors were used to measure accelerometry and gyroscopy from arms of healthy controls (n=11) and patients with arm weakness due to recent stroke (n=13) while the subjects performed three pre-selected upper extremity exercises. Sensor data was then labeled by exercise type, and this labeled data set was used to train a machine learning classification algorithm for identifying exercise type. The machine-learning algorithm and a peak-finding algorithm was used to count exercise repetitions in non-labeled data sets. We achieved a repetition counting accuracy of 95.6 ± 2.4 % overall, and 95.0 ± 2.3 % in patients with arm weakness due to stroke. Accuracy was decreased when using fewer sensors or using accelerometry alone. Our exploratory study suggests that body-worn sensor systems are technically feasible, well-tolerated in subjects with recent stroke, and may ultimately be useful for developing a system to measure total exercise “dose” in post-stroke patients during clinical rehabilitation or clinical trials.Competing Interest StatementMC10 Inc. provided the sensor equipment (BiostampRC sensors) for this research. However, MC10 Inc. was not involved in the design, analysis, or results of the study in any way.Funding StatementAB was supported by the following grants: NRSA 2T32NS007338-16 (NIH) and the NTRAIN K12 program (NIH/NICHD 1K12 HD093427-01). This project is also supported by a pilot grant from the University of Rochester CHeT Institute.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSensor data for this paper will be made available via request to the authors