PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Vahdani, Amir M.
AU  - Faghani, Shahriar
TI  - Deep Conformal Supervision: a comparative study
AID  - 10.1101/2024.03.28.24305008
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.03.28.24305008
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/28/2024.03.28.24305008.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/28/2024.03.28.24305008.full
AB  - Background Trustability is crucial for Al models in clinical settings. Conformal prediction as a robust uncertainty quantification framework has been receiving increasing attention as a valuable tool in improving model trustability. An area of active research is the method of non-conformity score calculation for conformal prediction.Method We propose deep conformal supervision (DCS) which leverages the intermediate outputs of deep supervision for non-conformity score calculation, via weighted averaging based on the inverse of mean calibration error for each stage. We benchmarked our method on two publicly available datasets focused on medical image classification; a pneumonia chest radiography dataset and a preprocessed version of the 2019 RSNA Intracranial Hemorrhage dataset.Results Our method achieved mean coverage errors of 16e-4 (CI: le-4, 41e-4) and 5e-4 (CI: le-4, 10e-4) compared to baseline mean coverage errors of 28e-4 (CI: 2e-4, 64e-4) and 21e-4 (CI: 8e-4, 3e-4) on the two datasets, respectively.Conclusion In this non-inferiority study, we observed that the baseline results of conformal prediction already exhibit small coverage errors. Our method shows a relative enhancement, particularly noticeable in scenarios involving smaller datasets or when considering smaller acceptable error levels, although this improvement is not statistically significant.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:https://kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-intracranial-hemorrhage-detection https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jhoward/rsna-hemorrhage-jpgI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at: https://kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-intracranial-hemorrhage-detection https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jhoward/rsna-hemorrhage-jpg https://kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-intracranial-hemorrhage-detection https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jhoward/rsna-hemorrhage-jpg