Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the motor cortex leads to a sequential increase in phase synchronization and power of TMS-evoked electroencephalographic recordings - Martino, Enrico De; Casali, Adenauer Girardi; Nascimento Couto, Bruno Andry; Graven-Nielsen, Thomas; Ciampi de Andrade, Daniel (medRxiv, 2024)
Background High-frequency (10 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the primary motor cortex (M1) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders, but its main mechanism of action remains unclear.Objective To probe four cortical hubs used for rTMS (M1; dorsolateral-prefrontal cortex, DLPFC; anterior cingulate cortex, ACC; posterosuperior insula, PSI) with TMS coupled with high-density electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) and measure cortical excitability and oscillatory dynamics before and after active and sham rTMS to M1.Methods Before and immediately after active or sham M1-rTMS (15 min, 3,000 pulses at 10 Hz), single-pulse TMS evoked EEG were recorded at the four targets in 20 healthy individuals. Measures of cortical excitability and oscillatory dynamics were extracted at the main frequency bands (α [8-13 Hz], low-β [14-24 Hz], high-β [25-35 Hz]).Results Comparing active and sham M1 rTMS, M1 TMS-EEG demonstrated an increase in high-β synchronization in electrodes around M1 stimulation area and remotely in the contralateral hemisphere (p=0.026). The increase in high-β synchronization (48-83 ms after TMS-EEG stimulation) was succeeded by an enhancement in low-β power (86-144 ms after TMS-EEG stimulation) both locally and in the contralateral hemisphere (p=0.006). No significant differences were observed in TMS-EEG responses probing DLPFC, ACC, or PSI.Conclusion M1-rTMS engaged a sequence of enhanced phase synchronization, followed by an increase in power occurring within M1, that spread to remote areas and was measurable after the end of the stimulation session. These results are relevant to understanding the M1 neuroplastic effects of rTMS and associated changes in cortical activity dynamics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT05714020Funding StatementThe Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) is supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF121). The current study is supported by a Novo Nordisk (Grant NNF21OC0072828) and ERC Horizon Europe Consolidator grant (PersoNINpain 101087925).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The local ethics committee approved the study (N-20220018). Den Videnskabsetiske Komite for Region Nordjylland Niels Bohrs Vej 30, 9220 Aalborg ostI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors