Radiomic analysis of patient and inter-organ heterogeneity in response to immunotherapies and BRAF targeted therapy in metastatic melanoma - Tompkins, Alexandra; Gray, Zane N.; Dadey, Rebekah E.; Zenkin, Serafettin; Batavani, Nasim; Newman, Sarah; Amouzegar, Afsaneh; Ak, Murat; Ak, Nursima; Pak, Taha Yasin; Peddagangireddy, Vishal; Mamindla, Priyadarshini; et al. (medRxiv, 2024)
Background Variability in treatment response may be attributable to organ-level heterogeneity in tumor lesions. Radiomic analysis of medical images can elucidate non-invasive biomarkers of clinical outcome. Organ-specific radiomic comparison across immunotherapies and targeted therapies has not been previously reported.Methods We queried UPMC Hillman Cancer Center registry for patients with metastatic melanoma (MEL) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-PD1/CTLA4 [ipilimumab+nivolumab; I+N] or anti-PD1 monotherapy) or BRAF targeted therapy. Best overall response was measured using RECIST v1.1. Lesions were segmented into discrete volume-of-interest with 400 radiomics features extracted. Overall and organ-specific machine-learning models were constructed to predict disease control (DC) versus progressive disease (PD) using XGBoost.Results 291 MEL patients were identified, including 242 ICI (91 I+N, 151 PD1) and 49 BRAF. 667 metastases were analyzed, including 541 ICI (236 I+N, 305 PD1) and 126 BRAF. Across cohorts, baseline demographics included 39-47% female, 24-29% M1C, 24-46% M1D, and 61-80% with elevated LDH. Among patients experiencing DC, the organs with the greatest reduction were liver (−88%±12%, I+N; mean±S.E.M.) and lung (−72%±8%, I+N). For patients with multiple same-organ target lesions, the highest inter-lesion heterogeneity was observed in brain among patients who received ICI while no intra-organ heterogeneity was observed in BRAF. 267 patients were kept for radiomic modeling, including 221 ICI (86 I+N, 135 PD1) and 46 BRAF. Models consisting of optimized radiomic signatures classified DC/PD across I+N (AUC=0.85) and PD1 (0.71) and within individual organ sites (AUC=0.72∼0.94). Integration of clinical variables improved the models’ performance. Comparison of models between treatments and across organ sites suggested mostly non-overlapping DC or PD features. Skewness, kurtosis, and informational measure of correlation (IMC) were among the radiomic features shared between overall response models. Kurtosis and IMC were also utilized by multiple organ-site models.Conclusions Differential organ-specific response was observed across BRAF and ICI with within organ heterogeneity observed for ICI but not for BRAF. Radiomic features of organ-specific response demonstrated little overlap. Integrating clinical factors with radiomics improves the prediction of disease course outcome and prediction of tumor heterogeneity.Competing Interest StatementRB declares PCT/US15/612657 (Cancer Immunotherapy), PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof), PCT/US63/055227 (Methods and Compositions for Treating Autoimmune and Allergic Disorders); JJL declares DSMB: Abbvie, Immutep; Scientific Advisory Board: (no stock) 7 Hills, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio (stock) Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Kanaph, Mavu, Onc.AI, Pyxis, Tempest; Consultancy with compensation: Abbvie, Alnylam, Avillion, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Flame, Genentech, Gilead, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Immunocore, Incyte, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Ribon, Rubius, Silicon, Synlogic, Synthekine, TRex, Werewolf, Xencor; Research Support: (all to institution for clinical trials unless noted) AbbVie, Agios (IIT), Astellas, Astrazeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb (IIT & industry), Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Pfizer (IIT & industry) Replimmune, Rubius, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, Xencor; Patents: (both provisional) Serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy), PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof). P.C.L. declares equity interest in Amgen. D.D. declares grants/research support (NIH/NCI and Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) and consulting (Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) during the conduct of the study. D.D. also reports grants/research support (Arcus, CellSight Technologies, Immunocore, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Tesaro/GSK), consulting [Clinical Care Options (CCO), Finch Therapeutics, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), Medical Learning Group (MLG), Xilio Therapeutics], speakers' bureau (Castle Biosciences) and pending provisional patents related to gut microbial signatures of response and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade (US Patent 63/124,231 and US Patent 63/208,719) outside the submitted work. J.M.K. declares grants/research support (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen Inc.) and consulting (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Amgen Inc., Checkmate, Castle Biosciences, Inc., Immunocore LLC, Iovance, Novartis.) outside the submitted work. H.M.Z. declares grants/research support (NIH/NCI and Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) and consulting (Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) during the conduct of the study, grants/research support (NIH/NCI, Bristol-Myers Squibb and GlaxoSmithKline), personal fees (GlaxoSmithKline and Vedanta) and pending provisional patents related to gut microbial signatures of response and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade (US Patent 63/124,231 and US Patent 63/208,719) outside the submitted work. Y.G.N. declares consulting/advisory board (Immunocore, replimune, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Mallinkrodt, Intervenn bio), research to institution (BMS, Pfizer, Merck, replimune), and speaker (Immunocore, Pfizer).Funding StatementThis work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R01DE031729 (R.B., J.J.L.), P50CA097190 (R.B.), UM1CA186690 (J.J.L.), P50CA254865 (R.B., J.J.L., J.M.K, D.D., H.M.Z.), in part by National Cancer Institute through the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center CCSG award (P30CA047904), and in part by The University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing through the resources provided, specifically the HTC high-performance computing cluster supported by NIH award number S10OD028483.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol (Protocol No. STUDY20020107). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. All samples have written informed patient consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData relevant to this study is provided in supplementary tables. Other data will be provided upon request from the corresponding authors.AJCCAmerican Joint Committee on CancerASMAngularSecondMomentAUCarea under the ROCBMIbody mass indexCRcomplete responseCVcross-validationDBVdivided by volumeDCdisease controlFDRfalse discovery rateFOFfrist-order featureGLCMgray level co-occurrence matrixI+Nnivolumab plus ipilimumabICIand immune-checkpoint inhibitorsIMCinformational measure of correlationLDHlactate dehydrogenaseLOOCVleave-one-out cross-validationMELmelanomaNLRneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioNSCLCnon-small cell lung cancerPDprogressive diseasePRpartial responseRECISTResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsROCReceiver Operating CharacteristicSDstable diseaseSEMstandard error of the meanSOFsecond-order featureSOVFsecond-order feature divided by volumeULNupper limit normalVarImpvariable importance.