RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prevalence of Dural Puncture headache after caesarean section at a Tertiary Hospital in the Gambia
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.04.25.24306406
DO 10.1101/2024.04.25.24306406
A1 Anyanwu, Matthew
A1 Coker, Admire
A1 Simon, Donkor
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/04/28/2024.04.25.24306406.abstract
AB Background Following a caesarean section performed under spinal anaesthesia, a common complication is post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Spinal anaesthesia has become the most common anaesthetic procedure during caesarean section in our practice. Therefore, knowing the prevalence and risk factors of PDPH will inform practice and add value in our obstetrics practice.Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital from July to. September 2023. A structured data collection tool was used to collect data. The data was entered into a computer database and analyzed using the SPSS version 26. Pain was graded using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Results were expressed in simple descriptive statistics and test of significance was set at p-value 0.05.Results A total of 89 participants with mean age of 28 years (SD±6.1) and majority 45(50.6%), between 21 to 30 years. Majority had low parity (0 to 3), 64(71.9%), emergency CS of 71(79.8%), while only 20.2% (n=18) were elective CS. Overall prevalence of Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) was 42.7% with majority of cases presenting with Occipital headache (29.2%), lasting for 3hrs (18%). A statistically significant association between PDPH and Gestational age with p-value (p=0.02); number of attempts with p-value (p=0.01); larger needle gauge and number of CSF drops (p=0.01), respectively were observed.Conclusion Prevalence of PDPH was high and associated with the use of large needle gauges, multiple attempts and increased CSF drops. Patients that underwent emergency CS, have a higher risk of developing Post-Dural Puncture Headache.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was requested and secured from Research and Ethics Committee of Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesN/A