Examining Effective Patient-Provider Communication in Antenatal Settings across England: An In-Depth Analysis of Woman’s Experiences - Andrzejczak, Martyna; Jones, Gareth Elfed; Nye, Gareth Anthony (medRxiv, 2024)
Pregnancy requires appropriate guidance and support from healthcare professionals. Understanding women’s experiences of effective patient-provider communication through antenatal care is critical, as evidence suggests, inadequate communication could pose various risks to maternal and neonatal well-being. Despite efforts to modernise maternity services, recent assessments reveal persistent challenges, with nearly half of maternity services inspections categorised as ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement’. This qualitative systematic review investigated effective patient-provider communication in antenatal care settings across England, contributing essential insights into women’s experiences and feelings from various backgrounds.Methods This study utilised the PICo framework to formulate the research question, focusing on effective patient-provider communication in antenatal care settings across England. A comprehensive search involving various study types was conducted across electronic databases from 2010 onwards. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predefined, and relevant studies underwent thorough screening. Data synthesis involved a qualitative descriptive approach, employing thematic analysis to capture diverse experiences. Findings were summarised through coded extracts, supporting quotes, and a narrative addressing women’s experiences.Results The search identified 46 records, with six studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Results were synthesised utilising thematic analysis approach. Subsequently, five themes were distinguished: Responsive and engaging communication; Individualised treatment; Clear presentation of service information and informed choice; Continuity of care; and ‘Additional ways of communication’. The study identified key suggestions to improve patient-provider communication in antenatal care, including tailored training programmes aimed at HCPs focusing on empathy, active listening, building emotional connections, establishing trust, and providing continuity of care. Recommendations also emphasise transparent information and empowering women through communication. Likewise, suggestions extend to the incorporation of cultural safety training initiatives and addressing structural issues within the system. The study, however featured experiences of minority ethnic women, which may potentially impact results, limiting the findings generalisability. In addition, measuring women’s views amid the emotional intensity associated with pregnancy presents inherent challenges, hypothetically affecting the depth of understanding of the experiences.Conclusion Few key conclusions derived from women experiences highlight the need to re-address barriers to communication. Proposed strategies offer practical steps, but further research is urged to address emerging challenges by advocating for improved communication strategies in order to enhance prenatal care nationally.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors