One way or another, you’re not going to fit: Trans and gender diverse people’s perspectives on sexual health services in the United Kingdom - Witney, Tom; Rait, Greta; Saunders, John; Hobbes, Lorna; Mitchell, Laura; Stewart, Jay; McDonagh, Lorraine (medRxiv, 2024)
Objectives Trans and/or gender diverse (T/GD) people in the UK are less likely to access sexual health services (SHS) than cisgender people but are more likely to report negative experiences. The British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) developed expert recommendations for T/GD-inclusive SHS, but these lack service user perspectives. This study addressed this gap by asking T/GD people how SHS could be T/GD-inclusive.Methods Semi-structured interviews (n=31) and focus groups (n=21) were conducted with T/GD people aged 17-71 years old recruited through community organisations and social media, exploring experiences of SHS and inclusivity. Study design, materials, and analysis were informed by T/GD people and an advisory committee of charities and sexual health clinicians. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, managed using NVivo.Results Participants often expected that SHS were not set up for T/GD people. This was reinforced by poor experiences in other healthcare settings and the lack of information on NHS websites. Some participants had been denied care because they were ‘too complex.’ Participants wanted to know that SHS had engaged with the needs of T/GD people and looked for hallmarks of inclusivity, such as Trans Pride flags in reception areas. Some participants wanted specialist T/GD services, but others preferred to access general SHS. Staff attitudes were a key factor underpinning inclusivity. Anticipating having their identity questioned or needs dismissed, participants sought kindness and openness. Although the needs of T/GD people are diverse and different from cisgender service users, participants stressed that SHS staff already had the skills to deliver sensitive person-centred care and emphasised the value of inclusive SHS.Conclusion These findings provide insight into what a sample of T/GD people in the UK consider important for T/GD-inclusive SHS. Participants’ suggestions aligned with and reinforce BASHH expert recommendations. Importantly, they highlight the need for ongoing engagement to deliver T/GD-inclusive SHS.What is already known on this topicTrans and/or gender diverse people are less likely to engage with sexual health services than cis-gender peopleThe British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) Gender and Sexual Minority Special Interest Group (GSM SIG) has developed expert recommendations for trans-inclusive sexual health services, but user perspectives are missingWhat this study addsParticipant suggestions and preferences for inclusive services support BASHH GSM recommendationsParticipants looked for inclusive SHS that recognise, understand and affirm their needsHow this study might affect research, practice or policyEnhancing T/GD inclusivity involves active engagement with clinical spaces, processes and deliveryCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research, HPRU grant (NIHR200911)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was granted by University College London Research Ethics Committee (8805/007)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors