RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.11.15.23298583
DO 10.1101/2023.11.15.23298583
A1 Brin, Dana
A1 Sorin, Vera
A1 Barash, Yiftach
A1 Konen, Eli
A1 Nadkarni, Girish
A1 Glicksberg, Benjamin S
A1 Klang, Eyal
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/23/2023.11.15.23298583.abstract
AB Objectives This study aims to assess the performance of OpenAI’s multimodal GPT-4, which can analyze both images and textual data (GPT-4V), in interpreting radiological images. It focuses on a range of modalities, anatomical regions, and pathologies to explore the potential of zero-shot generative-AI in enhancing diagnostic processes in radiology.Methods We analyzed 230 anonymized emergency room diagnostic images, consecutively collected over one week, using GPT-4V. Modalities included ultrasound (US), computerized tomography (CT) and X-ray images. The interpretations provided by GPT-4V were then compared with those of senior radiologists. This comparison aimed to evaluate the accuracy of GPT-4V in recognizing the imaging modality, anatomical region, and pathology present in the images.Results GPT-4V identified the imaging modality correctly in 100% of cases (221/221), the anatomical region in 87.1% (189/217), and the pathology in 35.2% (76/216).However, the model’s performance varied significantly across different modalities, with anatomical region identification accuracy ranging from 60.9% (39/64) in US images to 97% (98/101) and 100% (52/52) in CT and X-ray images (p<0.001).Similarly, Pathology identification ranged from 9.1% (6/66) in US images to 36.4% (36/99) in CT and 66.7% (34/51) for X-ray images (p <0.001).These variations indicate inconsistencies in GPT-4V’s ability to interpret radiological images accurately.Conclusion While the integration of AI in radiology, exemplified by multimodal GPT-4, offers promising avenues for diagnostic enhancement, the current capabilities of GPT-4V are not yet reliable for interpreting radiological images. This study underscores the necessity for ongoing development to achieve dependable performance in radiology diagnostics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of Sheba Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors