PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Silveira, Rafael José AU - Sorbello, Carolina Carvalho Jansen AU - Wolosker, Nelson AU - de Campos, José Ribas Milanez AU - Cardoso, João José de Deus AU - Onofre, Alexandre Sherlley Casimiro TI - THE USE OF AN OBJECTIVE METHOD (CONTINUOUS EXOSOMATIC ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY WITHOUT EXTERNAL STIMULI) TO EVALUATE PATIENTS WITH HYPERHIDROSIS UNDERGOING VIDEO-ASSISTED SYMPATHECTOMY AID - 10.1101/2024.06.16.24309007 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.16.24309007 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/18/2024.06.16.24309007.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/18/2024.06.16.24309007.full AB - Objective To objectively assess continuous exosomatic electrodermal activity without external stimuli in primary hyperhidrosis patients, before and after sympathectomy and compare it with responses to clinical investigation questionnaires.Method In a prospective study, 28 participants were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 18 patients with palmoplantar hyperhidrosis who underwent sympathectomy on the fourth and fifth costal arches, bilaterally and sequentially. The second group, serving as a control, consisted of 10 patients. The assessment involved 2 self-explanatory questionnaires; the control group completed the questionnaires once, while the sympathectomy group completed them before surgery, one day and 30 days later. Sweating was objectively evaluated by measuring electrodermal activity (EDA) using the MP36R biosensor from Biopac Systems Inc. USA. This was done by carrying out measurements before surgery, on the first postoperative and on the thirtieth postoperative using an exosomatic technique and a constant electrical flow. Measurements were taken sequentially from the hands and feet, for 5 uninterrupted minutes at each site, after 10 minutes of rest, in a comfortable sitting position, without external stimuli, and in an air-conditioned environment. The study also collected anthropometric, clinical, and surgical data, and no significant sociodemographic differences were observed between the groups.Results In the group that underwent thoracic sympathectomy, there was a significant improvement in quality of life and a reduction in palmar and plantar sweating, as assessed by the questionnaires. Electrodermal activity showed significantly higher levels in the hands and feet of patients with hyperhidrosis compared to the control group during the preoperative assessment. After surgery, there was a reduction in electrodermal activity in the hands, and 100% of the sample analyzed showed a decrease in sweating. As for the evaluation of the feet, 67% of the patients reported a reduction in sweating, and 44% showed a statistically significant decline in EDA.Conclusion Continuous exosomatic electrodermal activity without external stimuli is a suitable method for assessing patients with palmoplantar hyperhidrosis, with appropriate clinical correlation compared to the questionnaire’s answers quantifying sweating and quality of life.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC (CAAE: 43287321.8.0000.0121), and all participants provided informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors