RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exploring the factors associated with prelacteal feeding in Papua New Guinea: a population-based cross-sectional study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.18.24309085
DO 10.1101/2024.06.18.24309085
A1 Maviso, McKenzie
A1 Namosha, Elias
A1 Guldan, Georgia
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/19/2024.06.18.24309085.abstract
AB Objective Prelacteal feeds disrupt early breastfeeding initiation and exclusive breastfeeding and increase the risk of childhood illnesses and under-five mortality. Despite its negative health outcomes, prelacteal feeding prevails in Papua New Guinea (PNG). This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with prelacteal feeding among women in PNG.Design and setting A population-based cross-sectional study based on Demographic and Health Survey dataSetting Papua New GuineaParticipants A total weighted sample of 4399 women was included in the study.Main outcome measures Prelacteal feeding, modeled using multivariable logistic regression.Results About 10% (95% CI: 9 to 11) of women provided prelacteal feeds to their infants in PNG. The most frequently reported prelacteal feed was plain water (71.7%), followed by grains (eg, noodles) (47.1%), dark green leafy vegetables (42.1%), and soup (39.7%). Women with no formal (AOR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0 to 3.0) or primary education (AOR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.9), from the Islands region (AOR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.5), who had a cesarean section (AOR 4.1, 95% CI: 2.4 to 7.2), and who had given birth at home or in the village (AOR 3.7, 95% CI: 2.1 to 6.8) had higher odds of providing prelacteal feeds. No statistically significant association was found between immediate newborn skin-to-skin contact after birth and prelacteal feeding.Conclusion Our study underscores the role of sociodemographic and healthcare system factors in prelacteal feeding. Strengthening healthcare providers’ capacity to increase mothers’ awareness of optimal breastfeeding and promote more health facility births is warranted. Comprehensive breastfeeding education should also be promoted at antenatal clinics and during outreach healthcare activities.Strengths and limitations of the studyThe rigor of the methodological approach and representativeness of the survey render its results and recommendations generalisable to the country.The study’s findings, based on appropriate estimation adjustments and sample design, are representative of female population in PNG; thus could guide policy development and design for effective infant and child feeding interventions.The study’s cross-sectional nature means that a temporal relationship cannot be established between the outcome and independent variables.Prelacteal feeding was assessed based on the maternal self-report, which might have resulted in desirability bias; mothers may be less likely to report that they have provided prelacteal feeds while knowing its adverse outcomes.The DHS did not collect some important information, such as maternal beliefs, misconceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards breastfeeding, which could impact prelacteal feeding in this context.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The DHS ProgramI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at The DHS Program website: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm. https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.