Boosting LLM-Assisted Diagnosis: 10-Minute LLM Tutorial Elevates Radiology Residents’ Performance in Brain MRI Interpretation - Kim, Su Hwan; Schramm, Severin; Wihl, Jonas; Raffler, Philipp; Tahedl, Marlene; Canisius, Julian; Luiken, Ina; Endrös, Lukas; Reischl, Stefan; Marka, Alexander; Walter, Robert; Schillmaier, Mathias; et al. (medRxiv, 2024)
Purpose To evaluate the impact of a structured tutorial on the use of a large language model (LLM)-based search engine on radiology residents’ performance in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis.Materials & Methods In this retrospective study, nine radiology residents determined the three most likely differential diagnoses for three sets of ten brain MRI cases with a challenging yet definite diagnosis. Each set of cases was assessed 1) with the support of conventional internet search, 2) using an LLM-based search engine (© Perplexity AI) without prior training, or 3) with LLM assistance after a structured 10-minute tutorial on how to effectively use the tool for differential diagnosis. The tutorial content was based on the results of two studies on LLM-assisted radiological diagnosis and included a prompt template. Reader responses were rated using a binary and numeric scoring system. Reading times were tracked and confidence levels were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Binary and numeric scores were analyzed using chi-square tests and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests each. Search engine logs were examined to quantify user interaction metrics, and to identify hallucinations and misinterpretations in LLM responses.Results Radiology residents achieved the highest accuracy when employing the LLM-based search engine following the tutorial, indicating the correct diagnosis among the top three differential diagnoses in 62.5% of cases (55/88). This was followed by the LLM-assisted workflow before the tutorial (44.8%; 39/87) and the conventional internet search workflow (32.2%; 28/87). The LLM tutorial led to significantly higher performance (binary scores: p = 0.042, numeric scores: p = 0.016) and confidence (p = 0.006) but resulted in no relevant differences in reading times. Hallucinations were found in 5.1% of LLM queries.Conclusion A structured 10-minute LLM tutorial increased performance and confidence levels in LLM-assisted brain MRI differential diagnosis among radiology residents.Clinical Relevance Statement Our findings highlight the considerable benefits that even low-cost, low-effort educational interventions on LLMs can provide. Integrating LLM education in radiology training programs could augment practitioners’ capacity to harness AI technologies effectively.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich (School of Medicine and Health) waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors