Treatment Outcome in Patients With Spinal Neurocysticercosis: A Systematic Review of Published Cases and Case Series - Garg, Ravindra Kumar; Rizvi, Imran; Nigam, Harish; Pandey, Shweta; Uniyal, Ravi (medRxiv, 2024)
Background Spinal neurocysticercosis is a rare central nervous system infection caused by the larval form of the Taenia solium tapeworm. Due to its rarity, most knowledge is derived from isolated case reports.Objectives This systematic review aims to evaluate existing case reports and observational studies to provide a comprehensive overview of the disease’s clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes.Methods Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. Case reports, case series, and observational studies were included. The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024496957).Results The search yielded 163 records describing 197 patients. Symptoms ranged from one week to over three years, with the most common being paraparesis or quadriparesis (61%) and back pain. Treatment modalities varied. with a combination of surgery and cysticidal drugs being the most preferred (45.2%) treatment. Surgery was done in 77% (152/197) of cases. In 45 % of cases (89/197) cysticidal drugs were given following surgery. Medical treatment alone was given to 22% (43/197) of patients.The majority of cases (92%) irrespective of treatment modality showed clinical improvement. Post-operative complications caused three deaths.Conclusions We noted that surgery followed by cysticidal drugs was the most preferred treatment. Medical treatment alone was given to many patients. Clinical improvement was observed in most cases, regardless of the treatment option used. The use of cysticidal drugs could eliminate the need for surgery in many spinal neurocysticercosis patients.Key message Most spinal neurocysticercosis patients improve clinically with surgery and cysticidal drugs, the most common treatment. Medical management alone also benefits many, suggesting potential to reduce surgical intervention with effective drug therapy.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNAAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes