RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 fMRI and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES): A systematic review of parameter space and outcomes
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.03.20121202
DO 10.1101/2020.06.03.20121202
A1 Ghobadi-Azbari, Peyman
A1 Jamil, Asif
A1 Yavari, Fatemeh
A1 Esmaeilpour, Zeinab
A1 Malmir, Nastaran
A1 Mahdavifar-Khayati, Rasoul
A1 Soleimani, Ghazaleh
A1 Cha, Yoon-Hee
A1 Shereen, A. Duke
A1 Nitsche, Michael A.
A1 Bikson, Marom
A1 Ekhtiari, Hamed
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/05/2020.06.03.20121202.abstract
AB The combination of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions with human brain mapping methods have supported research beyond correlational associations between brain activity and behavior. Functional MRI (fMRI) partnered with transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) methods, i.e., transcranial direct current (tDCS), transcranial alternating current (tACS), and transcranial random noise (tRNS) stimulation, explore the neuromodulatory effects of tES in the targeted brain regions and their interconnected networks and provide opportunities for individualized interventions. Advances in the field of tES-fMRI can be hampered by the methodological variability between studies that confounds comparability/replicability. In order to explore variability in the tES-fMRI methodological parameter space (MPS), we conducted a systematic review of 222 tES-fMRI experiments (181 tDCS, 39 tACS and 2 tRNS) published before February 1, 2019, and suggested a framework to systematically report main elements of MPS across studies. We have organized main findings in terms of fMRI modulation by tES. tES modulates activation and connectivity beyond the stimulated areas particularly with prefrontal stimulation. There were no two studies with the same MPS to replicate findings. We discuss how to harmonize the MPS to promote replication in future studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNone.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:None.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yeshttps://osf.io/5jbtg/?view_only=027124979b144c96bf220a98a6896e39