RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Genotype-first analysis in an unselected health system-based population reveals variable phenotypic severity of COL4A5 variants JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2024.06.04.24308453 DO 10.1101/2024.06.04.24308453 A1 Zellers, McKenzie A1 Solanki, Kaushal A1 Kelly, Melissa A A1 Murphy, Karyn M A1 Retterer, Kyle A1 Kirchner, H. Les A1 Bucaloiu, Ion Dan A1 Moore, Bryn A1 Mirshahi, Tooraj A1 Chang, Alexander R YR 2024 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/09/2024.06.04.24308453.abstract AB Introduction Our knowledge of X-linked Alport Syndrome [AS] comes mostly from selected cohorts with more severe disease.Methods We examined the phenotypic spectrum of X-linked AS in males and females with a genotype-based approach using data from the Geisinger MyCode DiscovEHR study, an unselected health system-based cohort with exome sequencing and electronic health records. Patients with COL4A5 variants reported as pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) in ClinVar, or protein-truncating variants (PTVs), were each matched with up to 5 controls without COL4A3/4/5 variants by sociodemographics, diabetes diagnosis, and year of first outpatient encounter. AS-related phenotypes included dipstick hematuria, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BSHL), proteinuria, decreased eGFR, and ESKD.Results Out of 170,856 patients, there were 29 hemizygous males (mean age 52.0 y [SD 20.0]) and 55 heterozygous females (mean age 59.3 y [SD 18.8]) with a COL4A5 P/LP variant, including 48 with the hypomorphic variant p.Gly624Asp. Overall, penetrance (having any AS phenotypic feature) was highest for non-p.Gly624Asp P/LP variants (males: 94%, females: 85%), intermediate for p.Gly624Asp (males: 77%, females: 69%), compared to controls (males: 32%; females: 50%). The proportion with ESKD was highest for males with P/LP variants (44%), intermediate for males with p.Gly624Asp (15%) and females with P/LP variants (10%), compared to controls (males: 3%, females 2%). Only 47% of individuals with COL4A5 had completed albuminuria screening, and a minority were taking renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Only 38% of males and 16% of females had a known diagnosis of Alport syndrome or thin basement membrane disease.Conclusion In an unselected cohort, we show increased risks of AS-related phenotypes in men and women compared to matched controls, while showing a wider spectrum of severity than has been described previously and variability by genotype. Future studies are needed to determine whether early genetic diagnosis can improve outcomes in Alport Syndrome.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe thank the Regeneron Genetics Center for providing funding for patient enrollment and exome sequencing for the DiscovEHR study, and we would like to acknowledge the Geisinger-Regeneron DiscovEHR Collaboration for the genotypic and phenotypic data. This work was supported by NIGMS grant GM111913 to T.M.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research study was approved by the Geisinger Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes