PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rizk, Olivier AU - Bick, Sarah AU - White, Blessings AU - Chidziwisano, Kondwani AU - Dreibelbis, Robert TI - Assessing the reliability and validity of pictorial-assisted 24-hour recall for measuring hand hygiene and child faeces disposal: a cross-sectional study in Malawi AID - 10.1101/2024.08.11.24311806 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.08.11.24311806 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/11/2024.08.11.24311806.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/11/2024.08.11.24311806.full AB - Whilst improving hygiene and sanitation behaviours is key to cost-effective and sustainable WASH interventions, measuring behaviour change remains a challenge. This study assessed the validity and reliability of pictorial 24-hour recall (P24hR), a novel method using unprompted recall of past activities through pictures, compared to structured observation for measuring handwashing with soap (HWWS) and safe child faeces disposal in rural Malawi. Data were collected from 88 individuals across 74 households in Chiradzulu district using both methods over a two-day period, with the recall period of the P24hR corresponding to the period of structured observation completed the previous day. Results showed poor agreement between P24hR and observations in detection of hygiene opportunities and behaviours. P24hR under-reported handwashing opportunities when frequency was high and over-reported them when frequency was low. The 95% limits of agreement for handwashing opportunities estimated through Bland-Altman analysis (-7.62 to 4.89) were unacceptably wide given median 5 opportunities observed per participant. P24hR also over-reported HWWS and safe child faeces disposal, and kappa statistics indicated agreement no better than by chance. Structured observation remains the preferred method for measuring hygiene behaviours despite its known limitations, including potential reactivity bias.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementOR was the recipient of a travel grant from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine to support travel and field data collection costs. No other specific funding supported this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by National Committee on Research in the Social sciences and Humanities in Malawi (Protocol No. P.01/23/718) as well as the Ethical Review Committee at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM MSc Ethics Ref: 28743).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsP24hRpictorial 24-hour recallHWWShandwashing with soapTAtraditional authorityNGOnon-governmental organisationLOAlimits of agreementPPVpositive predictive valueNPVnegative predictive value