PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Shoults, Catherine C.
AU  - Abulez, Dana
AU  - Nowak, Matthew
AU  - Bledsoe, Alasiah
AU  - Dormer, Nathan
AU  - Garza, Maryam Y.
AU  - Bona, Jonathan
AU  - Powell, Thomas
AU  - Hayes, Corey J.
TI  - Comparative Analysis of Adverse Event Reporting on Reddit and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
AID  - 10.1101/2024.08.13.24311929
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.08.13.24311929
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/14/2024.08.13.24311929.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/14/2024.08.13.24311929.full
AB  - This study explores the potential of Reddit as a pharmacovigilance data source by comparing its adverse event reports related to mental health drugs with those from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Using data mining techniques, we annotated 1,000 Reddit posts to identify drug-adverse event pairs, which were then compared to FAERS data. Significant differences were noted in the frequency and types of adverse events reported on each platform. For instance, Reddit showed higher reports of sexual dysfunction and cognitive disorders for certain drugs, which were less frequently reported in FAERS. This disparity suggests that Reddit could capture a different demographic or more candid discussions, potentially influenced by its pseudonymous nature. The findings indicate that social media platforms like Reddit can provide valuable insights into real-world drug effects, complementing traditional pharmacovigilance systems. This study highlights the need for further research to integrate social media data to enhance drug safety monitoring.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.