RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A framework for chronic care quality: results of a scoping review and Delphi survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.21.24312364
DO 10.1101/2024.08.21.24312364
A1 Ku, Grace Marie V.
A1 Van De Put, Willem
A1 Katsuva, Deogratias
A1 Ag Ahmed, Mohamad Ali
A1 Rosenberg, Megumi
A1 Meessen, Bruno
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/23/2024.08.21.24312364.abstract
AB Frameworks conceptualising quality of care abound and vary; some concentrate on specific aspects (e.g., safety, access, effectiveness), others all-encompassing. However, to our knowledge, tailoring to systematically arrive at a comprehensive care for chronic conditions quality (CCCQ) framework has never been done. We conducted scoping review and Delphi survey to produce a CCCQ framework, comprehensively delineating aims, determinants and measurable attributes.With the assumption that specific groups (people with chronic conditions, care providers, financiers, policy-makers, etc) view quality of care differently, we analysed 48 scientific and 26 grey literature deductively and inductively using the Institute of Medicine’s quality of care framework as the foundation. We produced a zero-version of the quality of chronic care framework, detailing aims, healthcare system determinants, and measurement mechanisms. This was presented in a Delphi survey to 49 experts with diverse chronic care expertise/experience around the world. Consensus was obtained after the first round, with the panel providing suggestions and justifications to expand the agreed-upon components. Through this exercise, a comprehensive CCCQ framework encompassing the journey through healthcare of people with chronic conditions was developed. The framework specifies seven CCCQ ‘aims’ and identifies health system determinants which can be acted upon with ‘organising principles’ and measured through chronic care quality ‘attributes’ related to structures, processes and outcomes. Tailoring quality of care based on the nature of the diseases/conditions and considering different views can be done to ensure a comprehensive offer of healthcare services, and towards better outcomes that are acceptable to both the health system and PwCCs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.itg.be/en/research/research-themes/quality-of-care-for-chronic-conditions Funding StatementThis study, as part of a programme of work Purchasing instruments to strengthen quality health services for chronic illnesses, was commissioned by the WHO Kobe Centre and the WHO Department of Health Financing and Economics. The Kobe Group, which includes Hyogo Prefecture, Kobe City, the Kobe Chamber of Commerce and Kobe Steel, in Japan, contributed financially to the development and production of the research report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Delphi survey protocol and an amendment thereto were reviewed and approved by the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp Institutional Review Board (protocol number 1627/22).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors