Possible impact of national responses to the COVID pandemic on medal tallies at the Paris 2024 Olympics - Orchard, John W.; Luies, Nathan; Buckley, Robert J.; Castricum, Adam (medRxiv, 2024)
Introduction Western Pacific nations have experienced lower excess mortality compared to rest of the world since 2020 and recently performed exceptionally well on the medal tally at the 2024 Paris Olympics. This study aimed to analyse any possible connection between these factors.Methods The top performing 18 nations from 2012, 2016 and 2020 Olympics (after Russia and Ukraine were excluded) had their relative Gold medals, total medals and medal points (Gold =3, Silver=2, Bronze=1) for Paris 2024 analysed using a backward stepwise linear regression model. Initial input factors included previous medal tallies, home city advantage, time zone effects, national excess deaths 2020-2023, average GDP growth 2020-2023 and number of country signatories to the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), with factors >P=0.10 removed sequentially.Results Total medals were best predicted by previous total medals (t=21.0, P<0.001) and home city advantage (t=4.1, P<0.001). Gold medals were best predicted by previous Gold medals (t=10.3, P<0.001), low national excess deaths (t=-3.2, P<0.007) and low signatories to the GBD (t=-2.2, P<0.05). Medal points were best predicted by previous medal points (t=18.1, P<0.001), home city advantage (t=3.2, P<0.007) and low national excess deaths (t=-1.8, P<0.09).Discussion The Western Pacific countries with a COVID-cautious national perspective (Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea) tended to win more Gold medals than expected in Paris, compared to countries with a COVID-stoical national perspective (e.g. Great Britain, United States) which won fewer Golds than expected. This suggests that a COVID-cautious mentality may have contributed to better performance than a COVID-stoical approach. It is unclear whether any mechanism was physiological (less infectious disease impact before or during the Olympics) or psychological. If this effect existed for Golds, it did not appear to have any effect on Silver and Bronze medals.Graphical abstractThe four countries with higher than 10% Excess mortality over the time period 2020-2023 all won fewer Gold medals than expected (based on Gold medals won in the three previous Olympiads). The five countries with lower than 6% Excess mortality over the time period 2020-2023 all won more Gold medals than expected in Paris. The relationship between Excess mortality and change in Gold medals was negative and moderately strong. In the linear regression for prediction of Gold medals in Paris, Excess mortality was a highly significant predictor (t=-3.2, P<0.007). The exact mechanism of this relationship (physiological via reduced infection or psychological or via unassessed confounders) is unclear, but it can be confidently stated that in the countries which had tighter pandemic restrictions in 2020-21 and lower excess mortality, athletes have not suffered any “immunity debt” relative to the rest of the world.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesA supplemental Excel file containing all data used for the analysis is included as an attachment