Empathy in psychotherapy: subjective ratings versus remote biosensing of interpersonal heart rate synchrony as outcome predictors - Gernert, Clara C.; Falkai, Peter; Falter-Wagner, Christine M. (medRxiv, 2024)
In addition to understanding empathy in an affective and cognitive dimension, the physiological domain plays a crucial role, especially in the emotional dynamics of interpersonal interactions during psychotherapy. Within the complex bio-psycho-social system of cognitive behavioural therapy language, cognition, emotion and physiological states of both, client and therapist, intertwine through interaction dynamics. The current study aimed to explore interpersonal physiological dynamics during psychotherapy sessions as an objective biomarker for predicting therapy outcome. In a follow-up assessment design, involving 25 client-psychotherapist dyads, wearable sensors monitored individual’s heart rate, while video cameras recorded movement behaviour during regular cognitive behavioural therapy sessions. Post-session reports and symptom questionnaires were collected from both, clients and therapists, after each session. Results showed that synchrony in head movement and heart rate emerged during psychotherapy sessions. Notably, heart rate synchrony from the initial session predicted changes in patients’ self-rated global severity index over time. The objective predictor, heart rate synchrony, emerged as particularly robust, surpassing patients’ subjective ratings of affiliation in explaining a higher variance of the therapy outcome variable. These findings highlight the potential shown by remote biomarker sensing of interpersonal dynamics for the prediction of psychotherapeutic effectiveness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the FoeFoLe-Programme 2018/2020 (Medical Faculty, LMU Munich, Promot 18/2018).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics commitee of Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Medical Faculty gave ethical approval for this work (19-170).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes