RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Aortic root anatomy and impact on new-onset conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.30.24312869
DO 10.1101/2024.08.30.24312869
A1 Layoun, Habib
A1 Kassab, Joseph
A1 Chedid El Helou, Michel
A1 El Dahdah, Joseph
A1 Iskandar, Odette
A1 Ali Majeed Saidan, Maryam Muhammad
A1 Abushouk, Abdelrahman
A1 Isogai, Toshiaki
A1 Reed, Grant
A1 Puri, Rishi
A1 Wazni, Oussama M.
A1 Krishnaswamy, Amar
A1 Harb, Serge
A1 Kapadia, Samir
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/31/2024.08.30.24312869.abstract
AB Background Angulation of virtual basal ring (VBR), also known as aortic annulus, in relation to sino-tubular joint (STJ) may lead to greater exposure of implanted stent to the conduction system, consequently increasing the risk of LBBB.Objective To measure VBR-STJ angle and explore its impact on the development of LBBB post TAVR.Methods Patients undergoing TAVR using the Sapiens 3 valve between 2016 and 2021, without pre-TAVR conduction anomalies were included. The angle between the VBR and the ascending aorta was measured as the angle between the VBR plane and the plane of the STJ on cardiac CT, along with the annulus dimensions. TAVR implantation depth was measured on intra-procedural fluoroscopy images.Results 1204 patients were included, with 145 having new-onset LBBB. The VBR-STJ angle was significantly greater in the new-onset LBBB group (7.3 ± 4.7 vs 5.9 ± 4.6, p=0.002), and the difference in implantation depth between the levels of right and none coronary cusp (RCC and NCC) was significantly correlated with the VBR-STJ angle (r=0.1, p=0.03). This angle was further associated with new-onset LBBB after adjustment to patient and procedural characteristics (OR 1.08 CI: [1.04, 1.13], p<0.001).Conclusion Patients developing LBBB have larger VBR-STJ angle which was associated with greater depth of implantation of the TAVR valve below the RCC compared to the NCC. Precise understanding of the aortic root anatomy can help to predict onset of LBBB which in turn can inform decision making regarding optimal way of treating aortic stenosis and may improve procedure planning.Condensed abstract This study explores the impact of the virtual basal ring (VBR) to the sino-tubular junction (STJ) angle on the development of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) post TAVR. The angle was measured in 1204 patients who underwent TAVR, with 145 developing LBBB post TAVR. The measured angle was significantly higher in patient with new-onset LBBB and was independently correlated with new-onset LBBB. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding the aortic root anatomy to improve TAVR planning and reduce the incidence of LBBB.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis is a retrospective studyFunding StatementNo external fundings was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Cleveland Clinic institutional review board approved this studyI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData referred to in the manuscript is not available for sharing per the institutional policies