Clinical evaluation of BD VeritorTM SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test performance compared to PCR-based testing and versus the Sofia® SARS Antigen point-of-care test - Young, Stephen; Taylor, Stephanie; Cammarata, Catherine; Roger-Dalbert, Celine; Montano, Amanda; Griego-Fullbright, Christen; Burgard, Cameron; Fernandez, Catherine; Eckert, Karen; Andrews, Jeffrey C.; Ren, Huimiao; Allen, Joseph; et al. (medRxiv, 2020)
Objectives The clinical performance of the BD Veritor™ System for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen (Veritor test), a chromatographic immunoassay that detects the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen, was evaluated on nasal specimens from patients with suspected symptoms of COVID-19.Methods and Materials Two studies were employed. In study 1, nasal specimens and either nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal specimens from 251 participants with COVID-19 symptoms (<=7 days from symptom onset [DSO]), >=18 years of age, were utilized to compare the Veritor test to the Lyra® SARS-CoV-2 PCR Assay (Lyra assay). In study 2, nasal specimens from 361 participants with COVID-19 symptoms (<=5 DSO), >=18 years of age, were utilized to compare performance of the Veritor test to that of the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA test (“Sofia test”). Positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) were the primary outcomesResults In study 1, the Veritor test had a PPA with the Lyra assay ranging from 81.8%-87.5% for the 0-1 through the 0-6 DSO ranges. In study 2, the Veritor test had a PPA, NPA, and OPA of 97.4%, 98.1%, and 98.1%, respectively with the Sofia test. Discordant testing showed one Lyra positive missed by the Veritor test and five Lyra positives missed by Sofia; one Veritor positive result was negative by Lyra.Conclusions The Veritor test met FDA-EUA acceptance criteria for SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing (>=80% PPA point estimate) for the 0-5 and 0-6 DSO ranges. In addition, the Veritor and Sofia tests showed a high degree of agreement for detection of SARS-CoV-2. The Veritor test should facilitate rapid and reliable results for COVID-19 diagnosis.Summary The BD Veritor SARS-Cov-2 antigen test met FDA-EUA acceptance criteria for SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing for subjects with COVID-19 symptoms (0-5 days after onset). BD Veritor and Quidel Sofia antigen tests had good agreement for SARS-CoV-2 detection; discordant analysis favored Veritor.Competing Interest StatementThe authors disclose the following conflicts of interest: CRD, CF, KE, JCA, HR, DSG, and CKC are employees of Becton, Dickinson and Company; SY, None; CC, None; AM, None ; CGF, None ; CB, None; JA, None ; RA, CEO and PI of Comprehensive Clinical Research LLC Clinical TrialRegistration of this study at ClinicalTrials.gov was not obtained as it did not fulfill the applicable minimum medical device clinical trial requirement criteria as per the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act. Specifically, this study did not assess health outcomes associated with the use of this assay.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Becton, Dickinson and Company; BD Life Sciences-Integrated Diagnostics Solutions. Non-BD employee authors received research funds as part of this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Continuing review approval: Advarra IRB-CR00170042-Approval date: 3 Dec 2019 Continuing review Becton Dickinson - BDX-GSCP01, Becton Dickinson Program for Collection of BioSpecimens (Pro00015576) study 1 COVID approval notice: Advarra IRB-MOD00683499-Approval date: 29 May 2020 Becton Dickinson - BDX-GSCP01, Becton Dickinson Program for Collection of BioSpecimens (Pro00015576) Study 2 COVID approval notice: Advarra IRB-MOD00717838-Approval date: 13 Jul 2020 Becton Dickinson - BDX-GSCP01, Becton Dickinson Program for Collection of BioSpecimens (Pro00015576)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study should be requested from Dr. Charles K. Cooper. Contact Devin.Gary@bd.com