Prospective evaluation of genome sequencing versus standard-of-care as a first molecular diagnostic test - Brockman, Deanna G.; Austin-Tse, Christina A.; Pelletier, Renée C.; Harley, Caroline; Patterson, Candace; Head, Holly; Leonard, Courtney Elizabeth; O’Brien, Kimberly; Mahanta, Lisa M.; Lebo, Matthew S.; Lu, Christine Y.; Natarajan, Pradeep; et al. (medRxiv, 2020)
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of clinical genome sequencing (cWGS) as a first genetic test for patients with suspected monogenic disorders.Methods We conducted a prospective randomized study with pediatric and adult patients recruited from genetics clinics at Massachusetts General Hospital who were undergoing planned genetic testing. Participants were randomized into two groups: standard-of-care genetic testing (SOC) only or SOC and cWGS.Results 204 participants were enrolled and 99 received cWGS. cWGS returned 23 molecular diagnoses in 20 individuals: A diagnostic yield of 20% (20/99, 95%CI 12.3-28.1%)), which was not significantly different from SOC (17%, 95%CI 9.7%-24.6%, P=0.584). 19/23 cWGS diagnoses provided an explanation for clinical features or were considered worthy of additional workup by referring providers. While cWGS detected all variants reported by SOC, SOC failed to capture 9/23 cWGS diagnoses; primarily due to genes not included in SOC tests. Turnaround time was significantly shorter for SOC compared to cWGS (33.9 days vs 87.2 days, P<0.05).Conclusions cWGS is technically suitable as a first genetic test and identified clinically relevant variants not captured by SOC. However, further studies addressing other variant types and implementation challenges are needed to support feasibility of its broad-scale adoption.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03829176Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. Illumina supplied a portion of the sequencing reagents to enable this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was completed in the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Genomic Medicine and was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified genomic and phenotype data will be made available upon request through a controlled access database. All variants identified by WGS have been submitted to ClinVar by the Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine Laboratory for Molecular Medicine.